IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] polling for three new working group documents

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com> Thu, 28 December 2006 14:51 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzwbG-0000de-H9; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:18 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzwbE-0000dO-Kz for mpls@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:16 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GzwbC-0000xZ-A1 for mpls@ietf.org; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:16 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Dec 2006 09:51:14 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.12,215,1165208400"; d="scan'208"; a="110438191:sNHT49501344"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBSEpDoh026090; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:13 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kBSEp8gX026534; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:11 -0500
Received: from [10.83.15.51] ([10.83.15.51]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE06B0EADF@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
References: <D109C8C97C15294495117745780657AE06B0EADF@ftrdmel1.rd.francetelecom.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; delsp="yes"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <EBF874B8-45B6-4A1A-A1CF-14D311830E6F@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] polling for three new working group documents
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 09:51:12 -0500
To: LE ROUX Jean-Louis RD-CORE-LAN <jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Dec 2006 14:51:10.0704 (UTC) FILETIME=[9D0EEF00:01C72A8F]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2005; t=1167317474; x=1168181474; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=tnadeau@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Thomas=20D.=20Nadeau=22=20<tnadeau@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[mpls]=20polling=20for=20three=20new=20working=20grou p=20documents |Sender:=20 |To:=20LE=20ROUX=20Jean-Louis=20RD-CORE-LAN=20<jeanlouis.leroux@orange-ft group.com>; bh=c7Nle3cKqaQUBwe1hirJ0xTlGcubBKg46gooF6MwdYE=; b=rWVQ13BtbLuAdt3x7GUgRyIqFJld5QK3yIzGOSotnOHltR2vWPJ08d/Hy1up7K3zwjPUVmv8 ztJRksj+oMpPN3+DJ6OOSJZ0qe1eM7Gxs/U0UVtZXQ9INqwSR26/7sQV;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=tnadeau@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 10d3e4e3c32e363f129e380e644649be
Cc: mpls@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org

	Salut Jean-Louis,

>  Hi Loa, all,
>
>
>> draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt
>
> I support, but the processing on ASBRs in the ping mode should be
> clarified.
> It seems that section 7 only discusses the traceroute mode.

	Agreed.  We need to clarify this.

> If we want the actual forwarding path to be excercised in the ping  
> mode,
> then transit ASBRs should not process the echo request and hence  
> cannot
> update the ASBR Trace Stack.
> A solution would consist of running a LSP Traceroute so as to retrieve
> the ASBR Trace stack and then this stack could be inserted within the
> echo request in ping mode...

	Agreed.

> Also there are a lot of nits, and inconsitencies in the terminology
> along the draft (I will provide comments in a separate email).

	Yes, I will attempt to fix these once you provide
comments.

	Merci,

	--Tom


>
>> draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt
>
> Support
>
>> draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00
>
> Support
>
> Regards,
>
> JL
>
>
>
>
>>
>> On 13.12.2006 13:52 Uhr, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> we have three documents there the authors have requested that they
>>> become working group documents. All three were on the agenda in San
>>> Diego and we registered support for the documents.
>>>
>>> Please respond to the mailing list within a week whether you think
>>> they should be made working group docs or not.
>>>
>>> The documents are:
>>>
>>>
>>> draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt
>>>
>>> draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00
>>>
>>> /Loa and George
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@lists.ietf.org
>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email