RE: [mpls] polling for three new working group documents

 Hi Loa, all,

> draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt

I support, but the processing on ASBRs in the ping mode should be
clarified.
It seems that section 7 only discusses the traceroute mode.
If we want the actual forwarding path to be excercised in the ping mode,
then transit ASBRs should not process the echo request and hence cannot
update the ASBR Trace Stack.
A solution would consist of running a LSP Traceroute so as to retrieve
the ASBR Trace stack and then this stack could be inserted within the
echo request in ping mode...
Also there are a lot of nits, and inconsitencies in the terminology
along the draft (I will provide comments in a separate email).  

> draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt

Support

> draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00

Support

Regards,

JL

> 
> On 13.12.2006 13:52 Uhr, "Loa Andersson" <loa@pi.se> wrote:
> 
> > All,
> > 
> > we have three documents there the authors have requested that they 
> > become working group documents. All three were on the agenda in San 
> > Diego and we registered support for the documents.
> > 
> > Please respond to the mailing list within a week whether you think 
> > they should be made working group docs or not.
> > 
> > The documents are:
> > 
> > 
> > draft-nadeau-mpls-interas-lspping-02.txt
> > 
> > draft-nadeau-rfc4379-bis-link-bundle-00.txt
> > 
> > and
> > 
> > draft-thomas-mpls-ldp-typed-wildcard-00
> > 
> > /Loa and George
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls