Re: [mpls] Closed: Short wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Carlos, Working Group and Qin Wu,

Carlos is right, the comments are on the draft in general and not
within the scope of the short wglc.

The first step after a working group request publication of a document
is an "AD Evaluation", rather than waiting for the IETF last call we
will blend Qin Wu's comments in when the comments from the AD Evaluation
are addressed.

I will go ahead and write the shepherd write-up.

/Loa

On 2013-12-22 21:57, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> Hi, Loa,
>
> Actually, the comments from Qin Wu are not limited to the changes from
the previous WGLC (as the call text specified). They are general comments
on the doc. All good and useful that we should discuss and address.
>
> But as such, I suggest we continue forward without stopping the pub request, and treat these as IETF LC comments and go incorporating them with others later.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -- Carlos.
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2013, at 11:52 PM, Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Working Group, authors and Qin Wu,
>>
>> The mail closing the wglc was not quite accurate, there are a set of
>> comments from Qin Wu (that I had misplaced). I've asked the authors
>> to address the comments.
>>
>> /Loa
>>
>> On 2013-12-21 16:27, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>>
>>> this wglc is closed. We have not other comments than support.
>>> This is what we expect after a penetrating discussion and the wglc
>>> limited to the changes based on this discussion.
>>>
>>> The working group chairs plan to go ahead and request publication.
>>>
>>> /Loa
>>>
>>> MPLS WG co-chair
>>>
>>> On 2013-12-12 15:52, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>>> Working Group,
>>>>
>>>> This is to start a one week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-10
>>>>
>>>> We did a wglc on draft draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 mid-2011. We had good
>>>> comments and the document almost ready to go. At that point a discussion
>>>> on the number of LDP session needed between a pair LSRs with both IPv4
>>>> and IPv6 emerged, it has taken us quite a long time to resolve this.
>>>>
>>>> However, the author, wg chairs and people making the comments now agree
>>>> that version -10 is resolve those comments.
>>>>
>>>> This working group last call is limited to the changes since the
>>>> previous last call. A diff can be found at:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-10
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please send you comments to the MPLS wg mailing list ([e-mail]).
>>>>
>>>> This wglc ends Dec 20, 2013.
>>>>
>>>> /Loa
>>>> for the MPLS wg co-chairs
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]