Re: [mpls] Closed: Short wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Sun, 22 December 2013 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2130B1AE3B0 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:01:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiioC0KED0qL for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lucidvision.com (lucidvision.com [72.71.250.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DD81AE392 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 07:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (static-72-71-250-38.cncdnh.fast04.myfairpoint.net [72.71.250.38]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93D92693267; Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:00:54 -0500 (EST)
References: <52A96B2D.6060003@pi.nu> <52B550D6.3030606@pi.nu> <52B67013.2050907@pi.nu> <88E7475E-8B64-4005-8A5A-780721D6D5AA@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <88E7475E-8B64-4005-8A5A-780721D6D5AA@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2BD21A79-030E-4EF6-97BE-EF895107D5BB@lucidvision.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a)
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 10:00:55 -0500
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Closed: Short wg last call on draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2013 15:01:00 -0000

> On Dec 22, 2013, at 8:57 AM, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Loa,
> 
> Actually, the comments from Qin Wu are not limited to the changes from the previous WGLC (as the call text specified). They are general comments on the doc. All good and useful that we should discuss and address.
> 
> But as such, I suggest we continue forward without stopping the pub request, and treat these as IETF LC comments and go incorporating them with others later.

I agree with Carlos. Let's please stick to the guidelines of the LC.

Tom 



> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- Carlos.
> 
> 
>> On Dec 21, 2013, at 11:52 PM, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> wrote:
>> 
>> Working Group, authors and Qin Wu,
>> 
>> The mail closing the wglc was not quite accurate, there are a set of
>> comments from Qin Wu (that I had misplaced). I've asked the authors
>> to address the comments.
>> 
>> /Loa
>> 
>>> On 2013-12-21 16:27, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> Working Group,
>>> 
>>> this wglc is closed. We have not other comments than support.
>>> This is what we expect after a penetrating discussion and the wglc
>>> limited to the changes based on this discussion.
>>> 
>>> The working group chairs plan to go ahead and request publication.
>>> 
>>> /Loa
>>> 
>>> MPLS WG co-chair
>>> 
>>>> On 2013-12-12 15:52, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>>> Working Group,
>>>> 
>>>> This is to start a one week working group last call on
>>>> draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-10
>>>> 
>>>> We did a wglc on draft draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6 mid-2011. We had good
>>>> comments and the document almost ready to go. At that point a discussion
>>>> on the number of LDP session needed between a pair LSRs with both IPv4
>>>> and IPv6 emerged, it has taken us quite a long time to resolve this.
>>>> 
>>>> However, the author, wg chairs and people making the comments now agree
>>>> that version -10 is resolve those comments.
>>>> 
>>>> This working group last call is limited to the changes since the
>>>> previous last call. A diff can be found at:
>>>> 
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-07&difftype=--html&submit=Go%21&url2=draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-10
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Please send you comments to the MPLS wg mailing list (mpls@ietf.org).
>>>> 
>>>> This wglc ends Dec 20, 2013.
>>>> 
>>>> /Loa
>>>> for the MPLS wg co-chairs
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> 
>> Loa Andersson                        email: loa@mail01.huawei.com
>> Senior MPLS Expert                          loa@pi.nu
>> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: +46 739 81 21 64
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls