[mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching-03
Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in> Mon, 04 February 2013 09:29 UTC
Return-Path: <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D6821F863F for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:29:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jB7GJOI+Kwh8 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm16-vm3.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com (nm16-vm3.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com [106.10.149.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCC921F8460 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [106.10.166.114] by nm16.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2013 09:29:28 -0000
Received: from [106.10.151.203] by tm3.bullet.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2013 09:29:28 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1015.mail.sg3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2013 09:29:28 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 299972.99044.bm@omp1015.mail.sg3.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 95142 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Feb 2013 09:29:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.in; s=s1024; t=1359970168; bh=wvFdS/ALckfZATvV0eVRuYrsXyjWM/27TNfUoesJkM4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=D6dq3R1Hxo/u3uhoaap+xJUYLtaplxY+S4yrhW7o4W0lCgzTystKvN+dj1dWQ6l/m7et3BFUYUdIDpczYy61Zzi2sNNe/iD6aBZ65tTLsNevDtJ92fEdmmQ72Bz9ppM3/0mP2CO3eWDwbNQVlWkZ5yJcWDLgAeEQiKPVORn//6U=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.in; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xmnp2q+g0ThZxziSf3xxUjXvWxEbZOlnXlxQ9o6DBq2QoChm7dvFIPlfm3lpFqknxUgKoMavzVdhuMthmoE2gp91oThQzaf/hHhknWAcJ/ooYga77zpQ30K6Rbhj0JpCqMzIImTdEVxP5LEWaEB4/xsWpp0suxsHHGgs4usga+E=;
X-YMail-OSG: INXvkpIVM1kM0d9iOnUp9JQLvoRrqsgSZ1HF6CTomODcNEZ bcaIFFkXarMmZ34C.o7no.dlelVre3JnkUYx7KCFqe.a2MbrGPYwyJ0FK7uW 0cgT_2ToIcR45772.vzfgydpFHBuIeSAQtPg49Cd1jXJpooBPrPLO0v8lM04 a8E.5fjT6eKqC2B7mpV7HqxnmmNkaSfMWbrjE7T04D3c0UOOK7ouXZ4Yv7cY qkwm1wkN6SuBhNB_wBu3cFNbwVMfmsfLWd1395Vagi70bdGfSOCB9uPE8Xg8 f3sie.MUIB1MK9N2BIL2EECwE6mBSyE5ZSB1o_6FHauVkYLtfn8ZLfdXRvRH 7a9uKFNGRcAOIlN29c8rqVv3LcUyRRM10Ug_AoKrGgkM4d3UdmHWZR54F56r kd6.HrT2Md1jQgl.6yr8VUPJI00lfu6XH6zoj8Q--
Received: from [115.112.61.194] by web190901.mail.sg3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:29:28 SGT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 001.001, RGVhciBBdXRob3JzLCBldCBhbC4sCgkxLiBUaGUgcHJvcG9zZWQgc29sdXRpb24gcmVjb21tZW5kcyB0aGUgdXNhZ2Ugb2Ygc2VjdGlvbiBsYXllciBPQU0gdG8gZmluZCBzaWduYWwgZmFpbHVyZXMgb24gYSBsaW5rLiBTaW5jZSB0aGUgdHdvIG5vZGVzIHdpbGwgYmUgYWJsZSB0byBkZXRlY3TCoGZhaWx1cmVzIGF0IGVpdGhlciBlbmQgb2YgYSBsaW5rIHVzaW5nIHRoZSBsaW5rIE9BTSwgd2h5IHdvdWxkIGl0IGJlIGEgbmVjZXNzaXR5IHRvIHNlbmQgdGhlIEFQUyBwYXlsb2FkIHRvIHRoZSBhZGphY2VudCABMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.131.499
Message-ID: <1359970168.93490.YahooMailNeo@web190901.mail.sg3.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:29:28 +0800
From: Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
To: MPLS <mpls@ietf.org>, "draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching@tools.ietf.org" <draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching@tools.ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="701135548-1691472892-1359970168=:93490"
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:20:54 -0800
Subject: [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-protection-switching-03
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Naveen T <naveen.thanikachalam@yahoo.in>
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 09:29:31 -0000
Dear Authors, et al., 1. The proposed solution recommends the usage of section layer OAM to find signal failures on a link. Since the two nodes will be able to detect failures at either end of a link using the link OAM, why would it be a necessity to send the APS payload to the adjacent node in the direction opposite to the failure? 2. If the switching commands Lockout, Manual Switch and Forced Switch are taken out of the equation, and assuming that a signal failure will be the only reason considered for a switch-over, will it still be necessary to use the APS protocol at all? Thanks and Regards, Naveen T
- Re: [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-… Huub helvoort
- [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-prot… Naveen T
- [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-prot… Naveen T
- Re: [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-… Naveen T
- Re: [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-… Naveen T
- Re: [mpls] Doubts on draft-helvoort-mpls-tp-ring-… Huub van Helvoort