IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: (with COMMENT)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 12 August 2013 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269E21F90FD; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.034, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cLBBUdXfeYzR; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F1C121F84EA; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7CHHvf5030809; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:17:57 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dsl-sp-81-140-15-32.in-addr.broadbandscope.com [81.140.15.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7CHHuoj030797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:17:56 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Martin Stiemerling' <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20130808195718.13984.49026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130808195718.13984.49026.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 18:17:56 +0100
Message-ID: <01cb01ce977f$e34f0310$a9ed0930$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGbazHxH4PRZ09LcIvIzh0Td0I++Jn4J9Ug
Content-Language: en-gb
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 17:23:08 -0000

Hmmm.

My intention was to ask for:
- approval of this charter by the IESG
- agreement that this does not need to go for external review

I will try to poke the tool to make it say this.

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: 08 August 2013 20:57
> To: The IESG
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> Subject: Martin Stiemerling's No Objection on charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Martin Stiemerling has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-mpls-05-01: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-mpls/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I am Ok with the charter, but the headline in the tool says "Is this
> charter ready for external review? Is this charter ready for approval
> without external review?", interesting isn't it?
> 
> Is it now w/ or w/o external review?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email