IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 05 October 2020 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0A33A0B23; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 07:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zPtvY7K4j6SG; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta7.iomartmail.com (mta7.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 677FB3A0B2C; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 07:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (vs1.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.121]) by mta7.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Ebr9A007565; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100
Received: from vs1.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472752203D; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs1.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31D9422044; Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([213.205.192.60]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 095Eboxi012590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:37:51 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Andrew G. Malis'" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Cc: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU2U7qK1FK0HoVTJqfoyoeCnuXWJ0+2xu5XjJJtQjWpXtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 15:37:49 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <026001d69b25$1a364db0$4ea2e910$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0261_01D69B2D.7BFB2AE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQIopY8CQdoe9fnKhGf+rPScRcluxQIflT4OqNQCRtA=
X-Originating-IP: 213.205.192.60
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-25706.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.864-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--24.864-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-25706.007
X-TMASE-Result: 10--24.863800-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: HLMPCFyIyBNfsB4HYR80Zh3Pziq4eLUfaMmm586o4gBIXJo+eGm+FBI0 ePrNo/nEXbdRoVo097zvGDor/GIRYFYv4BqgLuJUcI7vRACwF0IZskwWqoib3I4lLuJITAnA5SS t+JCedISF35Y+5Kr9cdRhM/66LMExfWxSklBAaGnxkn8eupvmjBfbPFE2GHrVg8vHe9ji82JjmY ucG05PD5oy6+bRaYkXsJVxkt9B663/ORgke/hrYfGvJzY37p+a+D+zbdY8EilYbPLopoBzQjKaP QElmQY4l+QcU0TYMReoEqkKu0SlDWFSCbxk53PfQjh5L2ZXj+z4h+uI7dxXxLu1Sf94ro4peZjq A2yQI6equR4bEQmavwZwNnCZFle+mSuhkyegN5+8coKUcaOOvVG+BHSGRsbgwfH2XZhguhCSN5t 8Lx0BlgBxqjUik25MlETKOSy0ENQUuHdpoxh1CU4eFUkH5CFcBXJ6j2Ez1IdDruIX2XuqxO//vb MLiEkVWFQNk4+HCoiv8TAvJrvuV7QJ4oUF56vogRTWSf0X8xmOz/LLJUcaHsmqrXFLFjsW6aX8T YIrj1uFZCZln65Hjpt6E4YKOIuodhxZTImqKvlFH6oTiImwh13HHpZF/7mwJwUz1ePFvP9R18Qp zXStTvkHxcbJXlk3KoWa7+H+3DvuTQq+tUM08C+PrAd8gbHJnTcLR8+TzEppPI6NmimM1AxP6uF bRm9qjaOMlOGY7eH/voIzhn8wZuVHGbcDbAq6FEUknJ/kEl5ZDL1gLmoa/OYq7Exe0AIoz7345D 1T/l/fd+P6wwCt84RtqopBKUBlYSqodBHDcgTO71MtW7o7rGAqb6R34mnr8WfbBAjtCIlKq7VPC geZRQ==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ADEx1D7wGACMIZ9GtlsQza5IBF4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:37:59 -0000

Thanks Andy,

 

That looks like a good point: I’m sure the authors will work on it.

 

Adrian

 

From: Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com> 
Sent: 03 October 2020 14:14
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: mpls <mpls@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]

 

Adrian,

 

I just looked through the draft and support its publication. That said, it would be nice if section 1 included a bit more motivation - what were the issues with the current states of RFCs 8029 and 8611 (besides needing to be "more precise"?) and what would be the consequences of leaving things as they were.

 

Cheers,

Andy

 

On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 11:59 AM Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk> > wrote:

I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever
produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of
support.

Thanks,
Adrian
-----Original Message-----
From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32
To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> >
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org> 
Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call :
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04

Hi MPLS WG,

As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the
working group last call as agreed by the chairs.

This email starts a two-week last call on
draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/

Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th.

While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you
can indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what
the reasons are for your opinions.

Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the
document.

Best,
Adrian

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email