Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
"Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com> Mon, 19 October 2020 06:36 UTC
Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B63A3A141A; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1jXsnnDdMzt4; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B2B3A1418; Sun, 18 Oct 2020 23:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml733-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 988EF6A6F4954966B383; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:36:13 +0100 (IST)
Received: from dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) by lhreml733-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 07:36:13 +0100
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.100) by dggeme704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:36:11 +0800
Received: from dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) by dggeme754-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.6.80.77]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 14:36:11 +0800
From: "Dongjie (Jimmy)" <jie.dong@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
Thread-Index: AdaY1LuALWlBbybiQBmQ3luSJJ9RCANC251g
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:36:11 +0000
Message-ID: <647798ade1834d7c98ec16ca9cb9415a@huawei.com>
References: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <00d001d698d4$f1bca890$d535f9b0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.108.243.143]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/UQmuQiNR_U6lpzh5TMXtO-F9inU>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04]
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 06:36:17 -0000
Hi Adrian, I just read this document and support its publication once the comments mentioned by others are resolved. It is helpful to clarify the organization of the registries at one place . Best regards, Jie > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: Friday, October 2, 2020 11:59 PM > To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Group Last Call : > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04] > > I know this is not the most exciting document the working group has ever > produced, but as shepherd I need to see some comments and expressions of > support. > > Thanks, > Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: mpls <mpls-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 24 September 2020 17:32 > To: 'mpls' <mpls@ietf.org> > Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update@ietf.org > Subject: [mpls] Working Group Last Call : > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04 > > Hi MPLS WG, > > As previously noted, I'm the shepherd for this document and I'm running the > working group last call as agreed by the chairs. > > This email starts a two-week last call on > draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update-04 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-registries-update/ > > Please send your opinions to the mailing list before October 9th. > > While yes/no opinions are not without value, it is far more helpful if you can > indicate whether you have read the latest version of the draft, and what the > reasons are for your opinions. > > Of course, all of your review comments will be helpful in improving the > document. > > Best, > Adrian > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working Gro… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Martin Vigoureux
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… tom petch
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Martin Vigoureux
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Dongjie (Jimmy)
- Re: [mpls] Concerned by the silence [Was: Working… Gyan Mishra