IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification

Faisal Iqbal <faisal.iqbal@msn.com> Tue, 26 February 2019 18:06 UTC

Return-Path: <faisal.iqbal@msn.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF820124408; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:06:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=msn.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JIl_u2OdAVkj; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:06:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM02-BL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092003069.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.3.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74522129524; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:06:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msn.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=cGUEhMz2PSqPaD8yW9aY4qKiAf7XKC1863LjwrLHi10=; b=a1Q4aHCNpEAZtkVNaccWLh0lFp4pXjRaYBqk/+NyjTop3BtUWnJnq/fuvNJZ6I3D0V+pwXxyMzHpd4MuPud7wInjW6pTQEvw32jGhrDxGS1z6a0Kw96/CLbpyZ5mrsU/nY3IoSyHUbPUeb4LPpYxItMukAEWAbsbNA0mQZ+68xl0KfI3AsXg551rnQTCK6hr7xzp4XQ2pJGynB+F9Wd92rAfJcalk5WzgSHoa8SUEhvcNFw+CseGCCK7bhh7JUgwvm1b8zdut7YRxxnMiu1oRq5cUC77qzpyndUWQgtKvIKstBfCamuLmU6Ruo0FKQgV7mMlX6sHMnY3yGGkGP0GYw==
Received: from CY1NAM02FT025.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.74.56) by CY1NAM02HT097.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1643.11; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:06:17 +0000
Received: from MN2PR18MB2992.namprd18.prod.outlook.com (10.152.74.52) by CY1NAM02FT025.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.75.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1643.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:06:17 +0000
Received: from MN2PR18MB2992.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d:695:123:4041]) by MN2PR18MB2992.namprd18.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::5d:695:123:4041%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1643.019; Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:06:17 +0000
From: Faisal Iqbal <faisal.iqbal@msn.com>
To: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org" <draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
Thread-Index: AQHUzaIaf2vuK0yOPUWtFwJsVaIH0KXyYF8o
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 18:06:17 +0000
Message-ID: <MN2PR18MB299235603D9FA727EB35E2EA8C7B0@MN2PR18MB2992.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
References: <98cdd254-2bf8-4bac-ebbc-c8645ab8e0ea@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <98cdd254-2bf8-4bac-ebbc-c8645ab8e0ea@pi.nu>
Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:5A5687C8598CC9D3C19FEC0F633E48B458A6AB32F8CC69894898452E56C469E4; UpperCasedChecksum:767FB896069902A053C32961007A30458FB6870C3925D5088B05E8A4DE9E1D80; SizeAsReceived:6981; Count:45
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-tmn: [pRIdP0tJExxbeXbaf3zmMJRRuYEhND5z]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-incomingheadercount: 45
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322404)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:CY1NAM02HT097;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY1NAM02HT097:
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: iC5ObuNDUOKrQZTECilhcDx16WT+IAb96hAGGENedUJKOadQkK6or4wSYx6AEIuE
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MN2PR18MB299235603D9FA727EB35E2EA8C7B0MN2PR18MB2992namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 0ab3f270-59c3-4899-2d94-08d69c151ab5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Feb 2019 18:06:17.5050 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1NAM02HT097
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BhOxz7uhGzejRAlQx99OisGbzLM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 21:32:59 -0000

Hi Loa,
I'm not aware of any IPR related to this document.

Regards,
Faisal

________________________________
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
Sent: February 26, 2019 12:08 AM
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: IPR poll on draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification

Working Group, authors,

We have started to prepare draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification
for working group adoption, prior to the wgap we need to do an IPR poll.

This mail starts this IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

There no IPR disclosures against draft-nainar-mpls-rfc8287-len-
clarification.

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS WG mailing list.* The
document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.


/Loa
  mpls wg co-chair
--


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email