IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Reviews of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 30 January 2024 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFF5C14F5EA; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:52:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.806
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.806 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQqEvuyFubEj; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3B1C14F5E9; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 05:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 40UDq8sO026464; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:08 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466C94604A; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE0A4604B; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.224]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([85.255.237.126]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 40UDq6cE024634 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:07 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify@ietf.org
Cc: 'mpls-chairs' <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:07 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <001301da5383$84477e30$8cd67a90$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdpTglQHhO0LEOzSRniQ5ZBUlPlQVA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 85.255.237.126
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=20221128; bh=12cQoXwRqJczvxA0Wfsyx we5OuXVLq/c/8jlu41EVg0=; b=I8lWYHn3ZVOMbkntXfwzO6yqWnf3C+oUNfkir Iuw7rB5QQLzZsx5sjf/9W2a5Jr6AhAsUDDrN+618DyDsaG/swPFwwUvFSY9X2a/c kfsc1LxGGk7fJu0fYbCVc/Udimq/xsWKKMHQOcolWFmo/58/vqzKJ4iOwKTCmW2p vCEwjizwvko8VQADYSsi/zyoap3oF7j9wVl9y7UUtv81hEggczjM0XDyyLTrhHuh 4AQt6HJ+mwlBXBpuI67BJ81Vrv5RTBfp9oiDJXHCz/1n9+kPGwObkyWY/KfcvtGn obRWH5hQMaHsyT3x1QaHeSmTdqBxS+lA6inzZwBndJrSF2Gkw==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28150.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--12.104-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--12.104-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28150.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--12.104100-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: nj1B5fcjkJVhVEh8hDAslxqkhv3OdF4DV2y0V2O63Z4wc9ThMH3qV3fI As2Z6U5okoEPf9Rwr1wyLxZ3t+JDz/3R19qvLSMo3IFFT9wqfr0/xRB6OGnb2pm3OIVSf4P5h+p tohYrHdC+zvmBxjl7LrEUASMCyVmD+HlzFrDtUQz10VztBt7yamUfjhTZG7XasGbspEp+vvyAp6 varRnL1djqXpDRxzJKtybv2bfcMaNhL7ZelmeZdWzBijri5+RVOhJ9m53n4aD/z5X0Kzxduof61 dbc+smN6V+wThLTbQtjDCTlZVnIYVxxDx5qbkR9OX/V8P8ail1bCjvvWZW+SSr0rzXOF0GfDMq3 z/Y/gtUgBwKKRHe+r8l3CtW75s8jV+xCvOFan/kvN+21bzSzemLvgooMDKKOcn+efEXjKKM=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Bzci6aaR3g-deSEodQP45GA1Ik4>
Subject: [mpls] Reviews of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 13:52:24 -0000

Hi authors of draft-mirsky-mpls-bfd-bootstrap-clarify,

In preparation for considering an adoption poll on your draft, I solicited
some reviews from members of the MPLS Review Team.

Carlos sent his review to the list, and you can see it at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Ch5giz4OzWVtDW2YIp225wVAISU/

A further review that reached me contained two thoughts:
1. Which WG does this document belong to? This document says it plans to
update RFC 5884, which is the product of BFD WG. 
2. Will this update make some existing implementations not complying to
standards? For example, the text in the end of section 3 refers to
I-D.kompella-mpls-lspping-norao and says the return mode in this case MUST
NOT be set to 3.

Additionally, Joel Halpern sent a pre-emptive adoption poll review which you
can see at
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/SzxY7OC763zjbeW57iHdlLfq2Fw/

While there is some work that needs to be done on the document, nothing
seems to be so big that it cannot be handled later (as updates after an
adoption poll). However, if you want to get on and address the issues in a
new revision, that might be a good thing.

However, the question about in which working group this draft belongs is an
important one. I am currently discussing this with the BFD chairs and will
get back to you. If you have opinions, please state them.

Meanwhile, there is no harm in doing a quick IPR poll, and I'll start that
in another thread.

Cheers,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email