Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MNA Framework
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Fri, 21 October 2022 18:46 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C18EC157B58; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:46:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BohVfysqQAGb; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:46:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 034B5C157B42; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 11:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.241] (c-8f02e353.020-236-73746f24.bbcust.telenor.se [83.227.2.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B38C368CD9; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 20:46:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <d3eb7b36-1c36-0f3a-1026-31feafe57cb4@pi.nu>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 20:46:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.3
Content-Language: en-CA
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "pals-chairs@ietf.org" <pals-chairs@ietf.org>, DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <2f1bd4a5-68ee-61a3-ecb7-de3fb3051b29@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <2f1bd4a5-68ee-61a3-ecb7-de3fb3051b29@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/CARlfVgAcTgjCPqlGQWgE7sjKHA>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MNA Framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 18:46:46 -0000
OPen DT and Working Groups, This poll is closed, and we have very good support to add the text to the framework document. Authors please post version -02, with the text added. /Loa for the MNA chairs On 2022-10-07 10:59, Loa Andersson wrote: > > Working Group(s), > > Following the discussion on the framework on the MPLS Open DT, the > 2022-09-29, the MNA chairs would like to ask if there is consensus > to include the following text in draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk? > > "This framework does not place any constraints on the scope or on > the ancillary data for a network action. Any network action may > appear in any scope or combination of scopes, may have no ancillary > data, may require in stack data, and/or post stack data. Some > combinations may be sub-optimal, but this framework does not place > any limitations on an MNA solution. A specific MNA solution may > define such constraints." > > Please respond with a simple support/not support email, to the MPLS > working group mailing list. > > The response should be with the MNA chairs 2022-10-21. > > Thanks, the MNA chairs. > > /Loa > for the MNA chairs > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert loa.pi.nu@gmail.com Bronze Dragon Consulting phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MN… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to th… John E Drake
- Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to th… Alexander Vainshtein
- Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to th… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to th… xiao.min2
- Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to th… Loa Andersson