Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MNA Framework

xiao.min2@zte.com.cn Sun, 09 October 2022 04:03 UTC

Return-Path: <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6908C14F743; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 21:03:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ye0YArSKiV5h; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 21:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF558C14F740; Sat, 8 Oct 2022 21:03:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MlT142n63z5BNS0; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 12:03:20 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4MlT0T3cvDz4y0v6; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 12:02:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njxh01app02.zte.com.cn ([10.41.132.206]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 29942DWn079099; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 12:02:38 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from xiao.min2@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njxh01app02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid201; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 12:02:38 +0800 (CST)
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 12:02:38 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa634247de3014a2b7
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202210091202385370643@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <2f1bd4a5-68ee-61a3-ecb7-de3fb3051b29@pi.nu>
References: 2f1bd4a5-68ee-61a3-ecb7-de3fb3051b29@pi.nu
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: xiao.min2@zte.com.cn
To: loa@pi.nu
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, pals-chairs@ietf.org, detnet-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 29942DWn079099
X-Fangmail-Gw-Spam-Type: 0
X-FangMail-Miltered: at cgslv5.04-192.168.250.138.novalocal with ID 63424808.000 by FangMail milter!
X-FangMail-Envelope: 1665288200/4MlT142n63z5BNS0/63424808.000/192.168.251.13/[192.168.251.13]/mxct.zte.com.cn/<xiao.min2@zte.com.cn>
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 63424808.000/4MlT142n63z5BNS0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/NAII8s4I1kCSdXCILcGJ1_U7GoQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MNA Framework
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2022 04:03:27 -0000

I support the update on MNA framework.






Best Regards,


Xiao Min









Original



From: LoaAndersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: mpls@ietf.org <mpls@ietf.org>;
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>;pals-chairs@ietf.org <pals-chairs@ietf.org>;DetNet Chairs <detnet-chairs@ietf.org>;
Date: 2022年10月07日 17:00
Subject: [mpls] Consensus call on additional tex to the MNA Framework





Working Group(s),
 
Following the discussion on the framework on the MPLS Open DT, the
2022-09-29, the MNA chairs would like to ask if there is consensus
to include the following text in draft-ietf-mpls-mna-fwk?
 
    "This framework does not place any constraints on the scope or on
    the ancillary data for a network action. Any network action may
    appear in any scope or combination of scopes, may have no ancillary
    data, may require in stack data, and/or post stack data. Some
    combinations may be sub-optimal, but this framework does not place
    any limitations on an MNA solution. A specific MNA solution may
    define such constraints." 
 
Please respond with a simple support/not support email, to the MPLS
working group mailing list.
 
The response should be with the MNA chairs 2022-10-21.
 
Thanks, the MNA chairs.
 
/Loa
for the MNA chairs
 
--  
Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert                          loa.pi.nu@gmail.com
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64
 
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls