IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map

"Santiago Alvarez (saalvare)" <saalvare@cisco.com> Sat, 29 May 2010 00:33 UTC

Return-Path: <saalvare@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8C33A690B for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:33:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gL71+wcPkt2h for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D015E3A68A9 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 17:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAK79/0urR7Hu/2dsb2JhbACeN3GkZJlkhRUEg0Q
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.53,321,1272844800"; d="scan'208";a="204515650"
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2010 00:33:08 +0000
Received: from xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-231.cisco.com [128.107.191.100]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4T0X8lA014333; Sat, 29 May 2010 00:33:08 GMT
Received: from xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.112]) by xbh-sjc-231.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 28 May 2010 17:33:08 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 17:32:56 -0700
Message-ID: <96327EF53EF71A48806DE2DFC034D57F0BAEA090@xmb-sjc-22b.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1D5F5B6AB4@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map
Thread-Index: Acr97fovWGELdmbmzEeKyK2GG/RPxQAPfh+gAA7zTAAACB51UAADMoBgAArX9yAAAVdKwA==
References: <C8246DBC.2063E%swallow@cisco.com><D4C56A454A92494AB873F2FBB8E4154807F3DBF7@emailbng5.jnpr.net><C6921F0EC3DEDB419A67B42AB1EA2138018FA2E5@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com><05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1D5F5B6AA5@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net><C6921F0EC3DEDB419A67B42AB1EA2138018FA56D@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com> <05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1D5F5B6AB4@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net>
From: "Santiago Alvarez (saalvare)" <saalvare@cisco.com>
To: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>, "Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena)" <ssaxena@cisco.com>, Shivakumar Channalli <shivakumar@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 May 2010 00:33:08.0761 (UTC) FILETIME=[82F5D890:01CAFEC6]
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, "Santiago Alvarez (saalvare)" <saalvare@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 00:33:20 -0000

It seems to me that, in order to find PHP acceptable for P2MP LSPs, one
the these two need to be acceptable:
1. precluding bud node support
2. bud node receiving duplicate traffic (label and unlabeled)
Cheers.

SA
--
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of
> Nitin Bahadur
> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2010 4:52 PM
> To: Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena); Shivakumar Channalli
> Cc: mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map
> 
> 
> Shaleen,
> 
> > I was referring to
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-
> > mapping-04
> 
> This draft does not say that PHP *must not* be used ever for RSVP
P2MP.
> This draft specifies a requirement for non-PHP behavior and solves
that
> problem.
> 
> > . Do you have an application where you use PHP? Is P2MP TE
> > with PHP going to be deployed in service provider networks?
> 
> Yes...we have customers (in deployment) using P2MP with PHP.
> 
> nitin
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email