IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map

Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net> Fri, 28 May 2010 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <nitinb@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467873A68C2 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2010 16:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AbSEXctqdrd1 for <mpls@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 May 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690263A6897 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 May 2010 16:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTABX8+PByEFjDqBdqh9GarcIg17Nhl4K@postini.com; Fri, 28 May 2010 16:55:32 PDT
Received: from EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::18fe:d666:b43e:f97e]) by P-EMHUB02-HQ.jnpr.net ([fe80::88f9:77fd:dfc:4d51%11]) with mapi; Fri, 28 May 2010 16:52:21 -0700
From: Nitin Bahadur <nitinb@juniper.net>
To: "'Shaleen Saxena (ssaxena)'" <ssaxena@cisco.com>, Shivakumar Channalli <shivakumar@juniper.net>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 16:52:21 -0700
Thread-Topic: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map
Thread-Index: Acr97fovWGELdmbmzEeKyK2GG/RPxQAPfh+gAA7zTAAACB51UAADMoBgAArX9yA=
Message-ID: <05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1D5F5B6AB4@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net>
References: <C8246DBC.2063E%swallow@cisco.com><D4C56A454A92494AB873F2FBB8E4154807F3DBF7@emailbng5.jnpr.net> <C6921F0EC3DEDB419A67B42AB1EA2138018FA2E5@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com> <05542EC42316164383B5180707A489EE1D5F5B6AA5@EMBX02-HQ.jnpr.net> <C6921F0EC3DEDB419A67B42AB1EA2138018FA56D@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C6921F0EC3DEDB419A67B42AB1EA2138018FA56D@XMB-RCD-206.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Last Calls on P2MP LSP Ping and Enhanced DS Map
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 23:55:43 -0000

Shaleen,

> I was referring to
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-rsvp-te-no-php-oob-
> mapping-04

This draft does not say that PHP *must not* be used ever for RSVP P2MP.
This draft specifies a requirement for non-PHP behavior and solves that problem.

> . Do you have an application where you use PHP? Is P2MP TE 
> with PHP going to be deployed in service provider networks?

Yes...we have customers (in deployment) using P2MP with PHP.

nitin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email