Re: [mpls] 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

It's not your fault, Martin, but I don't understand this second WG last call.

There was no revision to the document, and no discussion on the list that I can
see.
Will we adopt "This WG last call will be repeated until we get the answer we
want" as our normal mode of operation?

I wonder whether, in view of the absence of any changes or discussions, my
opinion from the previous last call still carries over.

For the record, my opinion as stated for the first last call has not changed,
although thanks to the IPR holder for the update that links directly to this
document.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: 10 July 2016 19:00
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
> 
> WG,
> 
> as said by Ross [1], I have been appointed Document Shepherd for
> draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed [2]. As such I am also running the second
> WG LC.
> 
> So, this e-mail starts a WG LC which will end on the 31st of July.
> 
> I'd like to remind that an IPR disclosure [3] exists against this document.
> 
> So it is time to state whether or not you are in favour of progressing
> the document. Please also take the time to review the document and post
> comments on its content.
> 
> Please respond to this call.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> [1]:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rxnEv4LnUiwhTiZOhowOC6AcHYU
> [2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed/
> [2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2769/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls