Re: [mpls] 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 22 July 2016 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B2C12B04A for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.62
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.62 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4QrocTOxMzC for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B997412D144 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 05:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6MCTaT8017706; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:29:36 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (dhcp-b05f.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.176.95]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6MCTZsd017695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:29:36 +0100
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Martin Vigoureux'" <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>, <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <57828D0C.6000100@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <57828D0C.6000100@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 13:29:38 +0100
Message-ID: <0a4d01d1e414$b6e07fe0$24a17fa0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHK12reTckU1MgdGo3835yU8a3jzaAydQXg
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-22466.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.114-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--18.114-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 1GZI+iG+MteI0KPyMNrNUkNTnAhL0/m3QPCWRE0Lo8JaW2Ktn+I8/hKA ewg97VeY2qAxUduGUHzZiwCPgDBYEWbxI8bKMM2V04Rmz/agfdxaNaxZBRbNWgv5ehI/zNJacF6 rggxRxksOIAD2O/MgJ33J0gEt3fM9Vkb6T8YCGB3huXUWQoMQt7d2noO4P7rALraGNlLRahhxDZ qHzfZ66Q3D4NiLZlKus4zBRS3zNhG36bWU2xVUigDPuhU4P53KUe6Cirv2Avf1hE3O9q/rWEvs0 z/QUgiyTPnwfilucT5zdzFkPjVoty2PQJ73d0XSQr2qXCJMSV91k+gP1XamtJsoi2XrUn/JyeMt MD9QOgAfACoClnjRoWLHjeGkjh9X3QfwsVk0UbtuRXh7bFKB7naaIfLBktk1gyssPVMwxZMe3B3 EQd53/lJdrC5U1OEGvuvB6gAgryg=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/DAY31G0WQPrVys8XGMO9nEHsQdM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 12:29:41 -0000

It's not your fault, Martin, but I don't understand this second WG last call.

There was no revision to the document, and no discussion on the list that I can
see.
Will we adopt "This WG last call will be repeated until we get the answer we
want" as our normal mode of operation?

I wonder whether, in view of the absence of any changes or discussions, my
opinion from the previous last call still carries over.

For the record, my opinion as stated for the first last call has not changed,
although thanks to the IPR holder for the update that links directly to this
document.

Thanks,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin Vigoureux
> Sent: 10 July 2016 19:00
> To: mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: [mpls] 2nd WG LC on draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
> 
> WG,
> 
> as said by Ross [1], I have been appointed Document Shepherd for
> draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed [2]. As such I am also running the second
> WG LC.
> 
> So, this e-mail starts a WG LC which will end on the 31st of July.
> 
> I'd like to remind that an IPR disclosure [3] exists against this document.
> 
> So it is time to state whether or not you are in favour of progressing
> the document. Please also take the time to review the document and post
> comments on its content.
> 
> Please respond to this call.
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> [1]:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/rxnEv4LnUiwhTiZOhowOC6AcHYU
> [2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed/
> [2]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2769/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls