[mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map)
Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com> Tue, 12 March 2013 18:56 UTC
Return-Path: <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8F921F8A67 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pv-+8ShLTnPr for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usevmg20.ericsson.net (usevmg20.ericsson.net [198.24.6.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B9A11E8176 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c618062d-b7f0d6d00000097e-b4-513f7a6295dd
Received: from EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.90]) by usevmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id DD.64.02430.26A7F315; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:56:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB103.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.120]) by EUSAAHC006.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.90]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:56:10 -0400
From: Gregory Mirsky <gregory.mirsky@ericsson.com>
To: Shahram Davari <davari@broadcom.com>, "hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com" <hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com>
Thread-Topic: On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: [mpls] 2nd working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map)
Thread-Index: AQHOH1NCxu+w5AH5Vkey9NP/4JqeRA==
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:56:09 +0000
Message-ID: <7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11206FBD5@eusaamb103.ericsson.se>
References: <512C960E.70109@pi.nu> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD962A2@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD9AAF4@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broa> <XNM1$7$0$0$$6$1$2$A$5004088U513f719e@hitachi.com> <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD9AB6D@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A6CE49E6084B141B15C0713B8993F281BD9AB6D@SJEXCHMB12.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7347100B5761DC41A166AC17F22DF11206FBD5eusaamb103ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFmphkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42KZXLonSjepyj7QoL3DzGJ9r6dF862z7BbX v7xnsljysoPd4vulJSwWt5auZHVg85h1/yybR+uZNSweS5b8ZPL4cvkzWwBLFJdNSmpOZllq kb5dAldGf9dm9oK3pRUvb0xnbWB8l9rFyMkhIWAisXzpYVYIW0ziwr31bF2MXBxCAkcYJbbe X80C4SxnlNh76wQjSBWbgJHEi4097CC2iECqxOy+fjYQm1ngF1DHJT0QW1igWOLGjHtQNRUS O07NgbL1JJZ+mgRWzyKgKnFi7Q6wmbwC3hLLtu9mhFi2jkniT8M3sCJOgXCJK5+vgxUxAp33 /dQaJohl4hK3nsxngjhbQGLJnvPMELaoxMvH/6DeUZb4PucRC0R9vkTD5EdsEMsEJU7OfMIy gVF0FpJRs5CUzUJSBhHXkViw+xMbhK0tsWzha2YY+8yBx0zI4gsY2VcxcpQWp5blphsZbGIE xuQxCTbdHYx7XloeYpTmYFES5w1yvRAgJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgbG0Qv+k xR+mf0dP3GhY9ea5rJnIo4kCkzhZ2X+dq0+3sVnmbymkdcoz52bJHxYH7o6FlyvVJn98fvfl EY3Em/XbJ26Nyp2w+cu/vRo++w+cVL7T3N74oP6e/fGP1z/7Hpu24Otv9trbS448DV+wW+nY izjHlYpMQisWnBatv7bs42v/otc7QjblKrEUZyQaajEXFScCAHd7WtqXAgAA
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>, "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:56:37 -0000
Dear All, What would be the most appropriate subject to continue this discussion? I'll give it a try, please feel free to change it. I think that there's nothing that can preclude from supporting UP MEP on MPLS-TP LSP, according to UP MEP definition of RFC 6371, even when multpiple PWs mapped to that LSP. Same, I think, is the true for p2mp PW. Note that service, VPWS, is not part of MPLS-TP architecture. Regards, Greg -----Original Message----- From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Shahram Davari Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:30 AM To: hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com Cc: mpls@ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org; mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map Hideki, So far no RFC or draft has talked about Down or UP MEP for LSPs. But if you think about it logically LSPs can't have UP-MEP because LSP can carry many PWs and each PW may enter the LSP from a different port/interface. PWs can have UP-MEP but only for P2P services (VPWS), otherwise they can't have UP-MEP either (same as LSP). My suggestion is to correct figures and change UP-MEPs to Down-MEPs for LSPs. Also to mention UP-MEP is out of scope. Thx SD -----Original Message----- From: hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com [mailto:hideki.endo.es@hitachi.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2013 11:20 AM To: Shahram Davari Cc: loa@pi.nu; mpls@ietf.org; mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re:Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call ondraft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map Hi Shahram, Just one comment. >I would also argue that LSPs can't have UP-MEPs, since PWs from many ingress ports can enter an LSP and therefore the LSP can't start on the ingress interface. I think this depends on implementations. Any RFC don't restrict to DOWN-MEPs in an LSP. Anyway, MEP mechanism is out of scope in this draft as you said. Thanks, Hideki Endo >Hi, > >Although I mentioned I am Ok with the draft to be advanced to RFC, but after reviewing it in more details it appears that the draft, in spite of its name, does talk about UP-MEP at all and only talks about UP-MIP, while the figures show UP-MEPs for LSPs. Even if the scope of the draft is UP-MIP, considering that there can't be a MIP without a MEP, the draft should have some wording regarding UP-MEPs and their applicability to LSPs and PWs. I would also argue that LSPs can't have UP-MEPs, since PWs from many ingress ports can enter an LSP and therefore the LSP can't start on the ingress interface. > >A quick fix at this point is to mention UP-MEP is out of scope and change the figures to only show Down-MEPs. A better fix is to elaborate on UP-MEP and its applicability and placement, etc. > >Regards, >Shahram > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >Shahram Davari >Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2013 11:30 AM >To: Loa Andersson; mpls@ietf.org >Cc: <mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org>; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org >Subject: Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map > >My Comments are addressed and I support this draft to be published as Informational RFC. > >Thx >Shahram > >-----Original Message----- >From: mpls-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >Loa Andersson >Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:02 AM >To: mpls@ietf.org >Cc: <mpls-ads@tools.ietf.org>; mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org; >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map@tools.ietf.org >Subject: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map > >Working Group, > >draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-05.txt has been updated after a previous >last call, due to the nature a and extent of the updates we have chosen >to start a 2nd wg last call. > >The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map > >There's also a htmlized version available at: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-05 > >A diff from the previous version is available at: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-tp-mip-mep-map-05 > >Please send your comments, including approval of the documents and the >updates to the mpls working group list (mpls@ietf.org) > >This working group last call ends March 13, 2013. > >/Loa >for the MPLS working group co-chairs >-- > > >Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com >Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu >Huawei Technologies (consult) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > >_______________________________________________ >mpls mailing list >mpls@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > _______________________________________________ mpls mailing list mpls@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
- [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-ietf-… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… Pablo Frank
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call ondraft-ie… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call ondraft-ie… Shahram Davari
- [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd wor… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… Rolf Winter
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Zhenlong Cui
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Zhenlong Cui
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] 2nd working group last call on draft-i… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE: 2nd… Pablo Frank
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE:2ndw… hideki.endo.es
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE:2ndw… Shahram Davari
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE:2ndw… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] On Up and Down MEP in MPLS-TP (RE:2ndw… Shahram Davari