Re: [mpls] This is not a last call! draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt

Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 03 January 2024 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F14FC14F681; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 07:37:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.807
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.807 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=olddog.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWxSpHPhxYIm; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 07:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta5.iomartmail.com (mta5.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27979C14F680; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 07:37:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.124]) by mta5.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 403FbWBj013345; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:37:32 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59404604B; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:37:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9986A4604A; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:37:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.248]) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:37:32 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ([148.252.133.215]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 403FbUo5022753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:37:31 GMT
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Matthew Bocci (Nokia)'" <matthew.bocci@nokia.com>, mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
References: <170229632849.65032.11665899480670545575@ietfa.amsl.com> <00a501da2c3e$0057f5d0$0107e170$@olddog.co.uk> <2203B772-1E0B-4EEE-B220-03A8BC41FA48@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <2203B772-1E0B-4EEE-B220-03A8BC41FA48@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 15:37:30 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <00cd01da3e5a$c455b160$4d011420$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-gb
Thread-Index: AQEKheXiO5qwIugkG3AjMc6geRysEgJhNYYCAlDQYSSyQhfxgA==
X-Originating-IP: 148.252.133.215
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=olddog.co.uk; h=reply-to :from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= 20221128; bh=kcZrWB0GwNIV1uSof9L7nboWlV74DA4R258BCh/dsU4=; b=TId HxdQKHbHQkIeBhZdk+lhn3BoSF3SMMxAN6SoT59Wxr8aGXHlbra2vvMPo3O1EN6Y DJ/wdh/1dzjXxAArGI5QcqLTSxJjJwViPmb1HU8h1gmaUgrFTKTJQl6W6lssrhLZ wepIctGsmcthNTaMY7ZueHIzS5ap+zjFbBpdNkV8Y90LxP5deW6azlQxDCccsVUl s8qX8BAC8g7QQxJH7mNtSoCT0KiV378yiO8Ghs3KSEEmQO5Ypo2wp8Fp+F9f+9kc 7y8z1VDRi71U9F+Mq1Iem+hjOWTYFjdzXq8wp4j/rOvivJs1wCgm5ZYtkS1bbHv8 Sn4H1LwInFjVdEewceg==
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.0.1002-28098.000
X-TM-AS-Result: No--26.517-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--26.517-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.1.0.2090-9.0.1002-28098.000
X-TMASE-Result: 10--26.517300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: z5DqD3Ob671fsB4HYR80ZnFPUrVDm6jtyHdfpwipSH4gUEQTkIWiYtGs 69tdwZW7w6N1lEgp707NIfe1c9QrRx758KNkNhjcQjFlquvLZx5qwd/sYtbRQOYs+pHIx1njt3Y GUcAiLMVJLo4Pua23dJdax6dD7cjmY0pFVhY0RJyiVU7u7I4INQRryDXHx6oXGnRTfi8b/cfjG7 lc3cmGGjAj0+z8xXqsM4qHPFuKFdbXFDY6Be2LlZVRzPxemJL0EiWik8pFp6ENIbt2ZiH1ukB32 ynv+GCSoPSzg7nY0Tykh51KSUs/haNu8YiLlIJQGqSG/c50XgOIwnEwlXRCXgzvg1/q1MH2bev5 wFKyVv4NUccATRyd1FQg9TiyGsJNHU6vnrTGfsaOLgSHaCn47qTzJo0CZl8hzAKTiuEfBeKYFC8 uMwGxQZ2kzXFAqDYlooVJWxFlCoTvsNWMI3fHiLPx3rO+jk2Qi/c1Us2QTkCH5NN/XYzoZJk6GO wT9EoZSYg23IT4aTGxFAEjAslZg03g1xPYg7muAD5jSg1rFtB8Kj+UcZGF0mGNJSDUi0a6xAaY6 MFYVEcvcv4jhXl4I0n2LCKvldPV2w59RAnF8ZOeAiCmPx4NwFkMvWAuahr8Xedzf0x0feEMyrfP 9j+C1d934/rDAK3zUc1+O1X9AzE=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/FajF-6mr8XqU10G-96UO9w4xR5U>
Subject: Re: [mpls] This is not a last call! draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2024 15:37:41 -0000

Thanks Matthew.

I would *really* like to move ahead with a second WG last call on this, but before we go there, I'd like to hear from people who had comments in the previous last call. Are the changes in the right direction? Modulo stuff that might show up in a further full review, do you think the authors have done a good enough job addressing your concerns?

I'm aware that I, too, need to make that check for the review comments I submitted.

Of particular concern is for everyone to check that they are happy with the wording around ISD/PSD requirements. I think the authors have done a good job at clarifying what solutions do and don't need to do in support f ISD/PSD, but I'm just one person and I would really like to hear from a few of you who have strong opinions.

Thanks,
Adrian

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) <matthew.bocci@nokia.com> 
Sent: 03 January 2024 15:20
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk; mpls@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements@ietf.org
Subject: Re: This is not a last call! draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt

Hi WG

Thank you to everyone who reviewed the previous version of the draft and provided valuable comments.

There were many comments embedded in the WG last call discussions on the list and we made numerous changes to address these, as well as some other editorial improvements to the text. This made it a challenge to track all the improvements. 

Please refer to the following diff to see where changes were made: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-07&url2=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08&difftype=--html

We would greatly appreciate feedback on the updates and any further comments on the draft.

Best regards
Matthew 


On 11/12/2023, 14:26, "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk <mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk>> wrote:




CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.






Hi,


The authors have been busy making changes based on the extensive review
comments and discussions arising from the first last call for this document.


It would be really helpful if people could start to look through the
document and see which of their concerns have been addressed and what is
still outstanding.


Given the volume of comments, it would be no surprise if the authors need to
make a further round of adjustments, but starting to look at the text (and
possibly focusing on the diffs) might speed things along.


Thanks,
Adrian


-----Original Message-----
From: I-D-Announce <i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce-bounces@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of
internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Sent: 11 December 2023 12:05
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt


Internet-Draft draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt is now available. It
is
a work item of the Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) WG of the IETF.


Title: Requirements for Solutions that Support MPLS Network Actions
Authors: Matthew Bocci
Stewart Bryant
John Drake
Name: draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08.txt
Pages: 11
Dates: 2023-12-11


Abstract:


This document specifies requirements for the development of MPLS
network actions which affect the forwarding or other processing of
MPLS packets. These requirements are informed by a number of
proposals for additions to the MPLS information in the labeled packet
to allow such actions to be performed, either by a transit or
terminating LSR (i.e. the LER).


The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements/>


There is also an HTMLized version available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-08>


A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-0 <https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-mpls-mna-requirements-0>
8


Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts




_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org <mailto:I-D-Announce@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce>