IETF Logo Mail Archive

[mpls] Request for WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation

Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com> Tue, 26 December 2023 04:24 UTC

Return-Path: <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23828C14F683; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 20:24:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.155
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.741, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XveUZCJA3r5g; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 20:24:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com (cmccmta6.chinamobile.com [111.22.67.139]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ABAC14F5E2; Mon, 25 Dec 2023 20:24:04 -0800 (PST)
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[10.188.0.87]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app01-12001 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee1658a555d3e2-0ccb0; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 12:24:01 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee1658a555d3e2-0ccb0
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from chengweiqiang (unknown[223.104.3.235]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea658a555f115-5b5fa; Tue, 26 Dec 2023 12:24:01 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea658a555f115-5b5fa
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 12:24:01 +0800
From: Weiqiang Cheng <chengweiqiang@chinamobile.com>
To: mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: C15B3D05-3E89-41BB-8670-F379B45B3601
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.213[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <202312261224007424849@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart636458830204_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/GMINun6j-YK278F-UV0dkFrGa5o>
Subject: [mpls] Request for WGLC on draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 04:24:11 -0000

Dear Chairs and WG,

The authors have recently updated the document and you can review it in following link:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mpls-inband-pm-encapsulation-07.html 

As of now, all received comments have been addressed. Several vendors worldwide have successfully implemented the solution in the document. We now have mature running code and have validated it in operators network.

The authors believe that the draft has been mature and we would like to request a WGLC.

Best regards,
Weiqiang Cheng

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email