Re: [mpls] IPR poll on draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis

["Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]>]

Loa,

I am not aware of any IPR on top of the RFCs this document is bis-ing/merging. 

Question for you: should the data tracker flag the IPR disclosed to 4379 as to this doc?

Thumb typed by Carlos Pignataro.
Excuze typofraphicak errows

> On Dec 19, 2015, at 12:19, Loa Andersson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Working Group,
> 
> The authors of draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis has told us that
> the document is ready for working adoption.
> 
> We will do an IPR poll in parallel to the wgap.
> 
> This mail starts the IPR poll.
> 
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-smack-mpls-rfc4379bis?
> 
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> 
> There are no IPR disclosures filed directly against this document.
> However, there are  tow IPR disclosures against RFC 4379.
> 
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> 
> If you are on the MPLS WG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> 
> 
> /Loa
> mpls wg co-chair
> -- 
> 
> 
> Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]