[mpls] early allocations of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-00.txt

Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Tue, 24 March 2020 10:37 UTC

Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061003A09DB; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wc98J6HE2Rvf; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 859363A0995; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 03:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unknown [119.94.165.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BA08364FAB; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:37:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
To: Deborah A Brungard <db3546@att.com>
Cc: "mpls-chairs@ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, "mpls-ads@ietf.org" <mpls-ads@ietf.org>, IANA <iana@iana.org>, "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <952d898e-90b1-572a-1c78-f38757597a92@pi.nu>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:37:08 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/HuWNr1axbjw0pCSsKsCHOA6XDSA>
Subject: [mpls] early allocations of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-00.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:37:34 -0000

Deborah,

This is the process for early allocations of IANA codepoints as
described in RFC 7120. The comments preceded with (-) are mine
describing how the current draft meet the requirements for early
allocation,

    1.  The authors (editors) of the document submit a request for early
        allocation to the Working Group chairs, specifying which code
        points require early allocation and to which document they should
        be assigned.

        - This has been done, though the authors actually requested the
          code points to be made to an individual draft (draft-nainar-
          mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint)

        - The wg chair responded that early code point allocations can
          only be made to working group documents.

        - The working group document is no at hand and the working group
          chairs are prepared to go ahead and request the allocations.

    2.  The WG chairs determine whether the conditions for early
        allocations described in Section 2 are met, particularly
        conditions (c) and (d).

       - the working group chairs has reviewed the draft in the light
         of section 2 of RFC 7120.

       - the wg chairs are convinced that draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-
         ospfv3-codepoint all the criteria listed in section 2 of
         RFC 7120.

    3.  The WG chairs gauge whether there is consensus within the WG that
        early allocation is appropriate for the given document.

        - the wg chairs are convinced that the har consensus in the wg
          to go ahead and do the early allocation.

    4.  If steps 2) and 3) are satisfied, the WG chairs request approval
        from the Area Director(s).  The Area Director(s) may apply
        judgement to the request, especially if there is a risk of
        registry depletion.

        - This mail is the request according to step for in the process
          for early allocation.

        - the mail is sent to Deborah Brungard as responsible AD, with a
          copy to the the other rtg-ads.

        - we request support for early allocation of the codes as
          requested in Sectioon 7 (IANA considerations) in draft-ietf-
          mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint, i.e.:
          One new code point for OSPFv3 in the "Protocol in the Segment
          ID sub-TLV"
          Renaming of the existing OSPF code point in the same registry
          to "OSPFv3".

          and

          One new code point for OSPFv3 in the "Protocol in Label Stack
          Sub-TLV of Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV"
          Renaming of the existing OSPF code point in the same registry
          to "OSPFv3".

        - we will wait for the response from the responsible AD before
          going ahead with step 5 in this process.

    5.  If the Area Directors approve step 4), the WG chairs request IANA
        to make an early allocation.

    6.  IANA makes an allocation from the appropriate registry, marking
        it as "Temporary", valid for a period of one year from the date
        of allocation.  The date of first allocation and the date of
        expiry are also recorded in the registry and made visible to the
        public.


/Loa
for the MPLS wg co-chairs.

PS
This mail is sent to IANA, even though IANA do not need to take any
action until the formal request.
-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: loa@pi.nu
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: +46 739 81 21 64