Re: [mpls] early allocations of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-00.txt

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

IANA,

The requested early allocations have been approved by Deborah according 
to step 5 in the process of RFC 7120.

Can you please go head and makes the early allocations.

/Loa
for the mpls co-chairs

On 26/03/2020 03:18, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A wrote:
> Hi Loa, IANA,
> 
> I approve these early allocations-
> Thanks-
> Deborah
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 6:37 AM
> To: BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; IANA <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> Subject: early allocations of code points for draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint-00.txt
> 
> Deborah,
> 
> This is the process for early allocations of IANA codepoints as
> described in RFC 7120. The comments preceded with (-) are mine
> describing how the current draft meet the requirements for early
> allocation,
> 
>      1.  The authors (editors) of the document submit a request for early
>          allocation to the Working Group chairs, specifying which code
>          points require early allocation and to which document they should
>          be assigned.
> 
>          - This has been done, though the authors actually requested the
>            code points to be made to an individual draft (draft-nainar-
>            mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint)
> 
>          - The wg chair responded that early code point allocations can
>            only be made to working group documents.
> 
>          - The working group document is no at hand and the working group
>            chairs are prepared to go ahead and request the allocations.
> 
>      2.  The WG chairs determine whether the conditions for early
>          allocations described in Section 2 are met, particularly
>          conditions (c) and (d).
> 
>         - the working group chairs has reviewed the draft in the light
>           of section 2 of RFC 7120.
> 
>         - the wg chairs are convinced that draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-
>           ospfv3-codepoint all the criteria listed in section 2 of
>           RFC 7120.
> 
>      3.  The WG chairs gauge whether there is consensus within the WG that
>          early allocation is appropriate for the given document.
> 
>          - the wg chairs are convinced that the har consensus in the wg
>            to go ahead and do the early allocation.
> 
>      4.  If steps 2) and 3) are satisfied, the WG chairs request approval
>          from the Area Director(s).  The Area Director(s) may apply
>          judgement to the request, especially if there is a risk of
>          registry depletion.
> 
>          - This mail is the request according to step for in the process
>            for early allocation.
> 
>          - the mail is sent to Deborah Brungard as responsible AD, with a
>            copy to the the other rtg-ads.
> 
>          - we request support for early allocation of the codes as
>            requested in Sectioon 7 (IANA considerations) in draft-ietf-
>            mpls-lsp-ping-ospfv3-codepoint, i.e.:
>            One new code point for OSPFv3 in the "Protocol in the Segment
>            ID sub-TLV"
>            Renaming of the existing OSPF code point in the same registry
>            to "OSPFv3".
> 
>            and
> 
>            One new code point for OSPFv3 in the "Protocol in Label Stack
>            Sub-TLV of Downstream Detailed Mapping TLV"
>            Renaming of the existing OSPF code point in the same registry
>            to "OSPFv3".
> 
>          - we will wait for the response from the responsible AD before
>            going ahead with step 5 in this process.
> 
>      5.  If the Area Directors approve step 4), the WG chairs request IANA
>          to make an early allocation.
> 
>      6.  IANA makes an allocation from the appropriate registry, marking
>          it as "Temporary", valid for a period of one year from the date
>          of allocation.  The date of first allocation and the date of
>          expiry are also recorded in the registry and made visible to the
>          public.
> 
> 
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg co-chairs.
> 
> PS
> This mail is sent to IANA, even though IANA do not need to take any
> action until the formal request.
> 

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert
Bronze Dragon Consulting             phone: [phone]