IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4297)

"Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com> Tue, 10 March 2015 21:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6C61A8A93 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:32:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZxsTXDgglGu for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lucidvision.com (unknown [50.255.148.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848861A0122 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.120] (unknown [50.255.148.177]) by lucidvision.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA14302E121; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:31:56 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: "Thomas D. Nadeau" <tnadeau@lucidvision.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150310212651.6ADA0180452@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 17:31:58 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0B3EAD51-73B9-4BF4-8A8F-A90E062EDF7B@lucidvision.com>
References: <20150310212651.6ADA0180452@rfc-editor.org>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/KHCMyFsvPis9w1d6OyJX4IPtpuU>
Cc: msiva@cisco.com, Shaleen Saxena <ssaxena@Brocade.com>, mpls@ietf.org, sboutros@cisco.com, vishwas@ionosnetworks.com, Ross Callon <rcallon@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7394 (4297)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:32:08 -0000

	Fixing Shaleen's email.

	--Tom
	

> On Mar 10, 2015:5:26 PM, at 5:26 PM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7394,
> "Definition of Time to Live TLV for LSP-Ping Mechanisms".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7394&eid=4297
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Himanshu Shah <hshah@ciena.com>
> 
> Section: 3.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
> 3.1. TTL TLV Format
> 
> 
>   0                   1                   2                   3
>   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |  Type = 32769                 |   Length = 8                  |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |   Value       |   Reserved    |   Flags                       |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>                  Figure 1: Time To Live TLV Format
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 
> 3.1. TTL TLV Format
> 
> 
>   0                   1                   2                   3
>   0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |  Type = 32769                 |   Length = 4                  |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |   Value       |   Reserved    |   Flags                       |
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>                  Figure 1: Time To Live TLV Format
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In a TTL, Length value should show length of the value fields. There are already a couple of implementations out there which is setting the length to 4 (4-byte)
> 
> This should be corrected in order to make this RFC interoperable between different vendors.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC7394 (draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Definition of Time to Live TLV for LSP-Ping Mechanisms
> Publication Date    : November 2014
> Author(s)           : S. Boutros, S. Sivabalan, G. Swallow, S. Saxena, V. Manral, S. Aldrin
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email