Re: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 21 April 2016 09:02 UTC

User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.160212
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 02:01:54 -0700
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>, mpls@ietf.org
Message-ID: <A4C3F7C8-10A0-4E4E-ABED-4CC9B400A34B@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
References: <896EBEE8-E1D5-461B-9AD0-044BFE20F846@gmail.com> <5718966E.6000807@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5718966E.6000807@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3544048915_1918849520"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/KyrLbOLY89c6EToK2QjbKorbiNs>
Cc: rtgwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
Precedence: list

Thanks Pushpasis, including RTGWG. 

From:  Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date:  Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:59 AM
To:  Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>, <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject:  Re: WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

 Hi Jeff,

 Many many thanks for starting the WGLC call. 

 FYI, I am not aware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed (by Juniper and Cisco).

 Thanks and Regards,
 -Pushpasis

On Thursday 21 April 2016 01:12 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:

Dear RTGWG,

The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the

draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).

Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.

This mail starts that IPR poll.

Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection?

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules

(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

Currently there are two IPR disclosures on draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

(which was the pre-working group version of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection):

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2334/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2346/

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to

this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant

IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The

document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been

received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or

contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any

IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.

Thanks, 

Jeff and Chris

_______________________________________________
rtgwg mailing list
rtgwg@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

Re: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-pro… Pushpasis Sarkar
Re: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-pro… Jeff Tantsura