Re: [mpls] WGLC on draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection

Hi Jeff,

Many many thanks for starting the WGLC call.

FYI, I am not aware of any IPR other than the one already disclosed (by 
Juniper and Cisco).

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis

On Thursday 21 April 2016 01:12 PM, Jeff Tantsura wrote:
> Dear RTGWG,
> The authors of draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection have told us that the
> draft is ready for working group last call (WGLC).
> Before we do the WGLC we want to do an IPR poll on the document.
> This mail starts that IPR poll.
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to 
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection?
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
> Currently there are two IPR disclosures on 
> draft-psarkar-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection
> (which was the pre-working group version of 
> draft-ietf-rtgwg-rlfa-node-protection):
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2334/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2346/
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to
> this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant
> IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the MPLS wg mailing list.* The
> document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been
> received from each author and contributor.
> If you are on the RTGWG email list but are not listed as an author or
> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any
> IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> Thanks,
> Jeff and Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg