[mpls] Addressing comments on draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt

[Eric Osborne <[e-mail]>]

Folks-

  I have posted draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04.  It addresses the
gen-art comments as well as other feeback received on this list from
the v-03 last call.  I also shuffled things around so that the section
order made more sense.

  This draft elicited a comment and a warning from idnits.  I believe
they are both OK to disregard:

1)

  -- The draft header indicates that this document updates RFC6378, but the
     abstract doesn't seem to directly say this.  It does mention RFC6378
     though, so this could be OK.


It's pretty clear that the document updates rfc6378.


2)

  == Missing Reference: 'RFC-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-04' is mentioned on line
     412, but not defined


This is a self-reference which needs to be updated with the RFC number
for this draft.



  I expect this to be good to go, but given the amount of reshuffling
and new text I'd like to give folks one more shot at tweaking the
language.

The meat of the work is in section 2.2.  Adrian, Elwyn - this contains
the majority of the changes based on gen-art feedback and other
discussions on the list.  Please give this the once-over at your
convenience.




eric