IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB7D3A1ACA; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:09:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=1.5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TnCVGvo4aviz; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DB4C3A1AC3; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 05:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id o7-20020a05600c4fc7b029010a0247d5f0so4487749wmq.1; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:09:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=am6Fj9Gif2P4nvbwOic8qJsZ8YB7Pvk+N4+17W9LHtw=; b=rJ0JI/u86IVfftavZf/cSGKG8WK23e10Oi1Wc19lK7nDDCQjrXV2xT3LyWIvu7Dxc7 dNWRtgz9UB2UJM2UfMuywBbWQ+xuMBJ9V1t2GkPF7Jj7uSEQVP2LbGJKBneoHLulrgmY kXWvmFIchTHyxhlXR5mnV2L3L/8+7zcqYqGvHcFFVmwZyNM7v1fowmKSZAMiV0aBkKSX Mh0ztja2NLwvcih21OZSHWE624FnZFlIvQrNtLNRlGrNvkaOvPQm8Vtq4SxyvGSop1Tb xp1Yg30/Ry4qyh3E/u38PPj71Y/fln5UHsef+AXUw0hTSBIMncE8l2E26mb+H3hIjdBh Gv5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=am6Fj9Gif2P4nvbwOic8qJsZ8YB7Pvk+N4+17W9LHtw=; b=mvHvW0WUM/kPa1GYDexGrP2F/gl/L9xNbtYEHqCe6eXZyxUnF7dbEoxgj9Yz81a65s tUkugdhP139MLX9VzHNqQDdkzXcp9gnI4gHEGJGnqcE6o6QDIjJAB/BumaVbtta3CiI3 h+FtyZPpwO5MQbcToV0e17UqmPpdMw9HlPsUobGwWAfvurWAHmNYYs3+WmzFltAOHKQg 5GhaXxi4sKbL9G515bqneebk7V939Apk7KbeBjQ7E2xo8VjNLoSRabtE2BtqKD3yCpas sreClDKo3rRwjw7fzg0C79RS2H5ENcyIJ9b83Ol3TA52jUxF0o7b+EWsntmEVFox6K2A pW4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dIYvv+Eqd9rtRdxdNXzreJ1qbCGElCBSyRNwA85b6q5u1YWjt nMTwZj3F64BgVIAVpUcNZnU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzzzBdM+eP8C5gVKzrcZSxHKSN3BczPPHQQPOFTbXY6/2Ke8e30JdcwxvOEXfkZK9Uh062p6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4f14:: with SMTP id l20mr3036581wmq.71.1614863364013; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:09:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.8.125] ([185.69.145.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p16sm26441550wrt.54.2021.03.04.05.09.23 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 05:09:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A48848CD-8340-4BCD-954F-765D778CEA2F@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_63973545-35DD-415C-8C1F-3E1FB6985812"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 13:09:22 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20210228045245.GC21@kduck.mit.edu>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, mpls <mpls@ietf.org>, loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, "mpls-chairs@ietf org" <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl@ietf.org
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, DEBORAH A BRUNGARD <db3546@att.com>
References: <161424445907.24739.3898672250104883371@ietfa.amsl.com> <20210228045245.GC21@kduck.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ONuST6PhuE7P7SHjqRSusEGO9Eo>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc6374-sfl-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 13:09:29 -0000

Hi Ben,

Actually doing manual uploads is always a problem.

Here is the text change I proposed as an editor's note that Deborah could put in the IESG writeup if that satisfactorily resolves the issue. It will get picked up when I fix all the comments and issue a new version of the fully text.

OLD

9.  Carrying RFC6374 Packets over an LSP using an SFL

   The packet format of an RFC6374 Query message using SFLs is shown in
   Figure 5.

NEW

9.  Carrying RFC6374 Packets over an LSP using an SFL

   We illustrate the packet format of an RFC6374 Query message using
   SFLs for the case of an MPLS direct loss measurement in Figure 5.

END

=======

OLD

   RFC6378 and the optional UDP Return Object is defined in [RFC7876].

9.1.  RFC6374 SFL TLV

NEW

   RFC6378 and the optional UDP Return Object is defined in [RFC7876].

   Where a measurement other than an MPLS direct loss measurement is to
   be made, the appropriate RFC6374 measurement message is used (for
   example, one of the new types defined in this document) and this is
   indicated to the receiver by the use of the corresponding ACH type.

9.1.  RFC6374 SFL TLV

=========

Best regards

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email