IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6215 (7521)

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 23 May 2023 10:47 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA72C151546 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g_lhnln8E7-E for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52b.google.com (mail-pg1-x52b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D442C14F721 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5289cf35eeaso3235849a12.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1684838845; x=1687430845; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BioCbcOiwh+ZdEsbKGxJy74tfrSHavYWMDccOepwW+E=; b=lCYVNg+iL5aQsQUZLe0rRB+ipGdcgF36lkCZMRuCwSqALc+Ytvj2vAdvihG7WeEXbo PUolaQijwlL2BCssuBmCcqq3A11tn8+e5puaWpmr1xtuvf5atUinbRVN9v3F55IA0KWp FAOYvxbScIPWqiJBTxS2Duf2OACMO7znp/POM557m+BfxrrNldwVPKPUz9Q19nFD48I7 Xqin3M4QIOdJdv/8pKGKoNxtyIWde09e1Eh+yVWc8ddziFPW6s1jm2P75ffUS+/Es1M6 1V92CLlwgy5Bk2PUF0oBxsLq57Z4bNOBfwK9f8QHSZiQwkFyqIrXvKxDF/bEOF2MQTLg +CsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684838845; x=1687430845; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=BioCbcOiwh+ZdEsbKGxJy74tfrSHavYWMDccOepwW+E=; b=D9rRIQ6uub53B2zeT1hfyMe0RVFtAoMot+pfSUJdu8vWfellm1/JhpRTq8+SeUk22L YOFMtPF28k1bGfwMtxhFT4bELPWDvvMsd8XuBAjAFqUUx48lT1NfEOkzxwW1pQbHrSR7 P92gBRpaab0AG4pmSzxj1nkykhbVrkIKx8nTJBkjM9jFW+GdBe/3e2qh+2SI92oSVpOR V23jb+OR0XxRIN6YAEdnA8owrJqyQ2qF+e348sxVLq1O1YkpnNjn3iQkx1qqaIJSW7iy K3NXllqdXEBxXXSKD1k84zqQ5jZMay2pWmixYVkNKsgh6nl/j+cRvYQ5AcmlbN6k0Ph0 TqjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyi6qqCNkDiKPd1aLz5CBAvHTuT/Y/cZ3Nk30aprThhMCFMvhQc AFApQDz2aqhxl0ktXK22OhTOsHGTW/dqq9oaerkpWC3F
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6j1Q1atGlKgxqjLqFUHpLNfuTb5h2DQrY/8BQ85YHkGlczbUdE7KwKYYgHuMHzD+MnlveDY4KICBXOMm6ehHs=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ce8a:b0:253:25c3:7a95 with SMTP id g10-20020a17090ace8a00b0025325c37a95mr18485451pju.14.1684838845401; Tue, 23 May 2023 03:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230523064846.B5ED97FDDA@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230523064846.B5ED97FDDA@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 06:47:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1W-fjCojBJsD5eM5vwMW=Nn7-ERC=tafjXQOufb0wDAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, danfrost@cisco.com, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e250b505fc5a1c97"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/Q6rW4wL8HtzNvXY9Gf-xap77KNw>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6215 (7521)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 10:47:30 -0000

I agree with this erratum.

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 2:49 AM RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6215,
> "MPLS Transport Profile User-to-Network and Network-to-Network Interfaces".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7521
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
>
> Section: 1.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>    The Transport Service Interfaces for MPLS-TP are defined in Section
>    3.4.3 of [RFC5921].  These definitions are illustrated by showing
>    MPLS-TP Provider Edges (PEs) containing a UNI and an NNI.  The
>    figures illustrate the UNI and the NNI as a span.  However, it is
>    convention to illustrate these interfaces as reference points.
>    Furthermore, in the case of a UNI, it is useful to illustrate the
>    distribution of UNI functions between the Customer Edge (CE) side and
>    the PE side of the UNI, i.e., the UNI-C (User-to-User Interface,
>    Client side) and UNI-N (User-to-Network Interface, Network side), in
>    order to show their relationship to one another.
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>    The Transport Service Interfaces for MPLS-TP are defined in Section
>    3.4.3 of [RFC5921].  These definitions are illustrated by showing
>    MPLS-TP Provider Edges (PEs) containing a UNI and an NNI.  The
>    figures illustrate the UNI and the NNI as a span.  However, it is
>    convention to illustrate these interfaces as reference points.
>    Furthermore, in the case of a UNI, it is useful to illustrate the
>    distribution of UNI functions between the Customer Edge (CE) side and
>    the PE side of the UNI, i.e., the UNI-C (User-to-Network Interface,
>    Client side) and UNI-N (User-to-Network Interface, Network side), in
>    order to show their relationship to one another.
>
> Notes
> -----
> This is a very minor nit.
>
> As listed in Section 1.2., UNI stands for "User-to-Network Interface", not
> "User-to-User Interface".
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6215 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-uni-nni-03)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : MPLS Transport Profile User-to-Network and
> Network-to-Network Interfaces
> Publication Date    : April 2011
> Author(s)           : M. Bocci, L. Levrau, D. Frost
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email