Re: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03.txt
Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 01 July 2013 15:49 UTC
Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E57011E8248 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWoBrto2RzS7 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11BE11E8242 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id e11so9696666iej.1 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ihOnzWBeruyg4F5kn6RilTdhgG1Y6h6TxPOXxGb16T4=; b=oJLwc6jMmUHl5OidJmbohGsGjk0HixqJOTOZpVNekzqe4xKDN3XWjSXX5eYF4dNLDD /a729FAWsnXDrOgqQwx27Y8bXxTCsrVwVPvWJ5280P+4I0W4O0i0FYbipd7hza0zVenT gVwtdFy6ZOvNZ985ltkiQRlJZT6eyx8MbtgsrqppXYMzz/AA6BiJtHMV8ECBzZSgy6aJ faMgIlAgrdNg+uEeBcljKFFmqDWD0QbRHqOzgHAxkr336Tu7t25P3W2UWc4yaHDFgQw/ Y1WP3S6dyKP22Cgn4naebjD05xqjtCFv3moAzgwalMcPo4FazkMlye0yrPsmBa0AWfuw i2cA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.22.72 with SMTP id b8mr16148022igf.17.1372693753553; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.11.115 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 08:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CDF6E9E3.42649%josh.rogers@twcable.com>
References: <C9B5F12337F6F841B35C404CF0554ACB3F5B69F9@szxeml546-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CDF6E9E3.42649%josh.rogers@twcable.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 08:49:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOyVPHRrJtfUCK+NJD6XjWmDXFavDKSu9r8jEfe4HJD9c7hyPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Rogers, Josh" <josh.rogers@twcable.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b10c94791778904e0752b4d"
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 15:49:19 -0000
Hi Josh, Good point. I read the words and they did sound very confusing. As a format its an OCTET STRING, we however need to clarify the definition of the TC MplsNewExtendedTunnelId. We will update that text across. Thanks, Vishwas On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Rogers, Josh <josh.rogers@twcable.com>wrote: > RE: MplsNewExtendedTunnelId > >For IPv6 this represents an IPv4 address of the ingress or > >egress LSR for the tunnel for an IPv6 network. > > > We've been interested in changing a couple of private networks to v6 only, > but are waiting for feature in code and maturity of v6 MPLS, so may still > be a while before we can do it. I noticed that the language about the > Extended TunnelID uses words like 'suggests' and 'should' when speaking > about using a v4 loopback address as the TunnelId for a 'IPv6 network'. > If there is no v4 address because the network is v6 only, what should be > used instead? Are we setting the expectation that everything will be dual > stacked forever? > > Thanks for your response and insight, > Josh > > > On 6/27/13 11:58 PM, "Will Liu (Shucheng)" <liushucheng@huawei.com> wrote: > > >Hi Folks, > > > >We uploaded a new version to address the comments about MplsLSPID > >description as below. We are looking forward to your further comments. > >Thanks. > > > >Cheers, > >Will > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] > >Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:54 PM > >To: Tina TSOU; Will Liu (Shucheng); Francesco Fondelli; Vishwas Manral; > >Will Liu (Shucheng) > >Subject: New Version Notification for draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03.txt > > > > > >A new version of I-D, draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03.txt > >has been successfully submitted by Vishwas Manral and posted to the > >IETF repository. > > > >Filename: draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis > >Revision: 03 > >Title: Definitions of Textual Conventions (TCs) for > Multiprotocol Label > >Switching (MPLS) Management > >Creation date: 2013-06-28 > >Group: Individual Submission > >Number of pages: 22 > >URL: > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03.txt > >Status: > >http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis > >Htmlized: > >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03 > >Diff: > >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-manral-mpls-rfc3811bis-03 > > > >Abstract: > > This memo defines a Management Information Base (MIB) module which > > contains Textual Conventions to represent commonly used Multiprotocol > > Label Switching (MPLS) management information. The intent is that > > these TEXTUAL CONVENTIONS (TCs) will be imported and used in MPLS > > related MIB modules that would otherwise define their own > > representations. > > > > This document obsoletes RFC3811 as it addresses the need to support > > IPv6 extended TunnelID's by defining a new TC- > > MplsNewExtendedTunnelID which suggests using IPv4 address of the > > ingress or egress LSR for the tunnel for an IPv6 network. Changes > > from RFC3811 and the effect of the new TC to other related documents > > are summarized in Section 4 and 5, respectively. > > > > > > > > > > > >The IETF Secretariat > > > >_______________________________________________ > >mpls mailing list > >mpls@ietf.org > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls > > > This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable > proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to > copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely > for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you > are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that > any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to > the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and > may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify > the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of > this E-mail and any printout. > _______________________________________________ > mpls mailing list > mpls@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls >
- [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft-man… Will Liu (Shucheng)
- Re: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Rogers, Josh
- Re: [mpls] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Vishwas Manral