RE: [mpls] For your review

Loa,

I was meaning in general, ie labelled pkts.  Just want to check nothing
is being overlooked here.

regards, Neil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loa Andersson [mailto:loa@pi.se] 
> Sent: 08 October 2004 11:19
> To: Harrison,N,Neil,IKR2 R
> Cc: ewgray@GraIyMage.com; Nick.Weeds@dataconnection.com; mpls@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [mpls] For your review - 
> Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036
> 
> 
> Neil,
> 
> are you talking about packets exchange over the TCP 
> connection between two LDP peers, or (labeled) packets in genral?
> 
> /Loa
> 
> neil.2.harrison@bt.com wrote:
> > Eric,
> > <Snipped>
> >  
> > 
> >>Not if the downstream router sends a label withdraw as an 
> appropriate 
> >>recovery response to getting a packet with a label that is invalid.
> > 
> > 
> > Is there not a possibility that packets might end up at the wrong 
> > destination for other (defect) reasons?  And in such a case 
> sending a 
> > label withdraw seems the wrong action...comments?
> > 
> > regards, Neil
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Loa Andersson
> 
> Principal Networking Architect
> Acreo AB                           phone:  +46 8 632 77 14
> Isafjordsgatan 22                  mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
> Kista, Sweden                      email:  loa.andersson@acreo.se
>                                             loa@pi.se
> 

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

RE: [mpls] For your review - Issues/errors/clarifications in RFC3 036