Re: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: (with COMMENT)
Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 14:15 UTC
Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E73132052; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oGSCXaATU6j2; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1884313241E; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v189so6814897pgd.2; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3Omd06l1AjRD2jgZCmM8X4ksKqaP8p+pYvhPOTG3UOQ=; b=LrMQSXM2TVFE5Rx69GkmKS7v2t+AtzzLZVZxvjMEXzBNkZZm00sIOqDbopx35ujcbP a0StcnQr1Sx9OEbKFCkVe1PVe20s4dqjkb//aQWcYEyfw47NeRdqO/Wt1xo9XYPj1hi7 mTolJxxv4yiLP4orzjLog0Z1dym70J77Pt2OJ+5clOjpU7AAMapPrW5pSftt7ZC5w5Wv 5bb7Ztv8PMrcmaOK0ARn2+/FDtJ7O8xQy5Ln2MLq9iz3y7IyBVsaqjLZNEpV2Py0AzSg UWEcBvjmJnQuGQ9Sxa5RmcaGhPWiO7f2jChcIWPVxZcq4lLF6Ow40JaFen4gCthl3oAk l1og==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3Omd06l1AjRD2jgZCmM8X4ksKqaP8p+pYvhPOTG3UOQ=; b=Ab0CqQsrSrrS0oF3IRbIcn1iSipiFTnDatEp88fzwXf/YsWkwWeU6253iB/noeTltz Mvd+ttLc8JnaYArd4IkJFzrLj0cSwn2PYjKXSS8r8EGISjtY7zP5ncNUFKyig2pF4PXU rexbgBa7ohHFAUTQg31Ru7C0CmkEnEvVNSMK9RErg1/eAhIDP331hzCm8mTGp+Ssgttf b3juZEOFMzGYb9YVeWQQI4Y8KRNpQCTxx/QMBUlND2nHsnSojxRROtCJZluqECbKMkgt NomgbRBHleaxApb9LMna0KT2gShPgkuIrGbU1485NefAMBOIm5DJaxMxJnacVKwhBCzK SJOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111AgC4okAYBN4n0lgIKGmfgndMTwMckB0KBgF0dnUh7LUFwk2rz D/ouS7i4e0t4wnj8givsJ22tmwFsXw==
X-Received: by 10.84.214.151 with SMTP id j23mr2158254pli.322.1501769741737; Thu, 03 Aug 2017 07:15:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.144.1 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Aug 2017 07:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <80f840d5-8821-a6bb-41f5-8d4ffac3bda4@juniper.net>
References: <150169913913.5791.5598424201108583393.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <80f840d5-8821-a6bb-41f5-8d4ffac3bda4@juniper.net>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 10:15:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH7HSaPBUAk5-J-xHUNjH5Nudmzjwxdy26AKO=Tno0urXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/S6JLpZeO05IyLCtj7hHuOeW1qHM>
Subject: Re: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 14:15:44 -0000
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net> wrote: > I've modified the Security Considerations section (in the next rev, -03) to > contain the following paragraph: > > ----------- > > If a particular tunnel encapsulation does not provide integrity and > authentication, it is possible that a data packet's label stack can > be modified, through error or malfeasance, while the packet is in > flight. This can result in misdelivery of the packet. It should be > noted that the tunnel encapsulation (MPLS) most commonly used in > deployments of this specification does not provide integrity or > authentication; neither do the other tunnel encapsulations mentioned > in Section 4. > -------------- > > I think this addresses your comment. Eric, Thank you. I think this is helpful text to explain the considerations. Best regards, Kathleen > > > > On 8/2/2017 2:38 PM, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> >> Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The security considerations section should at least mention that none of >> the >> tunnel methods provide encryption or authentication of those mentioned >> earlier >> in the document (Section 4: LSP, IP, GRE, & UDP). Although this isn't >> listed >> as a discuss, I'd appreciate the comment being addressed with an update to >> the >> text (1-2 sentences at most). Thank you. >> >> > -- Best regards, Kathleen
- [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-… Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Eric C Rosen
- Re: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on dr… Kathleen Moriarty