[mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: (with COMMENT)

Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 August 2017 18:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E30131748; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 11:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.58.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150169913913.5791.5598424201108583393.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 11:38:59 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/BDqCUeR0WaPgKe0yfC3xL9DgUqc>
Subject: [mpls] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 18:38:59 -0000

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc3107bis/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The security considerations section should at least mention that none of the
tunnel methods provide encryption or authentication of those mentioned earlier
in the document (Section 4: LSP, IP, GRE, & UDP).  Although this isn't listed
as a discuss, I'd appreciate the comment being addressed with an update to the
text (1-2 sentences at most).  Thank you.