Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Thu, 28 June 2018 00:41 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 501A9130EF6; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0YN28D-YzaA; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x242.google.com (mail-oi0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D386C130F1B; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x242.google.com with SMTP id v8-v6so3580274oie.5; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kQKh7NUu2Q1bVPYwAHo14OTgvZmez63MoCKuTZHIuwE=; b=SuzrRVekp1JuaZq5AQ8UNxjG9CgZxcBW2KRpnNU75TjrFXbUMyrR3rFkn6ptjDpGX/ hS28a6mM6dTP/PvELAFJtllgf/lP9L36l6FfYyRKnqxU0xfmdeRAepcFIFNjCWjmoy8i LGy/+R5uBf5rqjIwYDRJhgywu9oQSRe0bsFin8C55jj4rUqjvydZ6sG3Ae22m5CpH2wt CVUHY+110N27LoWRO7timYVtUeM9ZiVsDpv+nN3zffP1iVbTdlQZMhvBrxH2L4Fwzszf wdtyRO32iYpOD3glsWguzT0sBNVxnkJNY/ZG6q19a/ajTiXbQHKb54dA5B7oJBTBbgfq aWTA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kQKh7NUu2Q1bVPYwAHo14OTgvZmez63MoCKuTZHIuwE=; b=WdYjxGqLG/PKqvC6tjaGGguY9M73tv5ggdpm4VkYqK7EFn4ovnZen1pSEgiAzKu/Ws p2l5gyCycmzu1EhjNzFHzwbUPE3Qdgz5dBW1itBD22GdVqYPtb7BMw0m5+A0EYITGkam QKg76fIA2FXELoUwOWxWsbOZDbw31t/YKPwwR17ZisjeMHV6LQBE1fpJO7MNsm0pBFC1 xU6kzEkNBl9w0j+DK04aauyw0oYh37tnvHf/8TNg809uMEXiQLPocjwGDBt1v271y+8+ 4cQteTFx89rs0pr58EhsPoSUAWDOSz4xJJ05BmnrIHna1GbF5oPisNFcN3EMr1GJdQM0 BOYQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3SLv8DzvXFPhDFuP3KNhYSXF1TIQwFuA9y8BI4UtYjsdoeGcgF ikDTYIQwicPcUT5g3eKkk3VGDYyoTr4tkgllwHz/mQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpeGne8rKp147FmM6Z+d6a7D/UU/3hmmalbyW03X45OtrWkH989tXbcH99wBtW6vFgRA39DYxFDXbsuP+daM6NI=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:dec1:: with SMTP id v184-v6mr4699016oig.98.1530146453269; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:40:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a9d:30c3:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <04a201d40e5f$87bbf0b0$9733d210$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <88D25496-1058-4FD0-A31A-C101B026C21F@cisco.com> <04a201d40e5f$87bbf0b0$9733d210$@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 20:40:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU1Y6Snz4et8Wj=2aS4SfK7bJuNPex3YJLDuJi7PEPOE1w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: "Tarek Saad (tsaad)" <tsaad=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org, mpls-chairs <mpls-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cd31ac056fa8fb15"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/S9TwSbaCgAtWvf-XNWPSDzp2ciQ>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:41:07 -0000

Adrian,

Indeed, I’ve already asked to present draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation. I
have no problem with your proposed ordering.

And your comments on my draft are, as always, invited, although you may
wish to wait for my next revision, which is mostly done and will most
certainly be uploaded before the end of this week.

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 5:40 PM, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> If the chairs are amenable and if there is time on the agenda, it might be
> helpful for me to spend some time with the WG discussing the issues with
> draft-ietf-mpls-sfc as raised on the list. Specifically the comments from
> Xiaohu, Zafar, and Andy about the "Micro Chains and Label Stacking" use
> case in Section 4.4, and the comments that "we had never discussed, prior
> to Segment Routing, using the label stack as a method to do source routing
> via only popping labels, with no label swapping along the path."
>
>
>
> I don't think we need a big fight or a history lesson, but it may be a
> good use of high bandwidth face time to clear up this point one way or the
> other an see whether there are any other open issues with this document.
>
>
>
> No doubt Andy will be asking to present draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation,
> and there may be value in doing a "compare and contrast" of
> draft-ietf-mpls-sfc and draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation. If anyone
> thinks that would be helpful then I'd be happy to work on that with Andy.
>
>
>
> That would make the agenda ordering...
>
> - draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation presentation
>
> - compare and contrast the two drafts
>
> - draft-ietf-mpls-sfc open issues
>
>
>
> But we are putty in the hands of our chairs.
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
>
>
> *From:* mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tarek Saad
> (tsaad)
> *Sent:* 18 June 2018 15:01
> *To:* mpls@ietf.org
> *Cc:* mpls-chairs@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> We are building the MPLS WG session’s agenda for IETF102 in Montreal. The
> preliminary agenda for IETF102, is available at:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/agenda.html
>
>
>
> The MPLS WG session is currently scheduled for:
>
> Tuesday, July 17, 2018 (EDT), 9:30-12:00  Morning session I
>
>
>
> Please send slot requests for presenting at the MPLS session copying
> myself and the WG chairs - indicate draft name, speaker and desired
> duration.
>
> If presenting, your slides will be due by Friday July 13th. Please send
> slides to myself and the WG chairs.
>
>
>
> A reminder to authors/editors of MPLS WG drafts that will not be
> discussed/presented at IET102 to send a status report to the WG list by
> Friday March 13th so it can be included in the MPLS WG progress report.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tarek and MPLS WG chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>
>