Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Wed, 27 June 2018 21:41 UTC

Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Tarek Saad (tsaad)'" <tsaad=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
References: <88D25496-1058-4FD0-A31A-C101B026C21F@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <88D25496-1058-4FD0-A31A-C101B026C21F@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 22:40:55 +0100
Message-ID: <04a201d40e5f$87bbf0b0$9733d210$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04A3_01D40E67.E9912190"
Thread-Index: AQL+rG2I0TSWUDXGrCApCzH7SZYmhqIfYt8Q
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/3Yyi8J9wdsbHtNmPs_yqfSDip1E>
Subject: Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102
Precedence: list

Hi, 
 
If the chairs are amenable and if there is time on the agenda, it might be helpful for me to spend some time with the WG discussing the issues with draft-ietf-mpls-sfc as raised on the list. Specifically the comments from Xiaohu, Zafar, and Andy about the "Micro Chains and Label Stacking" use case in Section 4.4, and the comments that "we had never discussed, prior to Segment Routing, using the label stack as a method to do source routing via only popping labels, with no label swapping along the path."
 
I don't think we need a big fight or a history lesson, but it may be a good use of high bandwidth face time to clear up this point one way or the other an see whether there are any other open issues with this document.
 
No doubt Andy will be asking to present draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation, and there may be value in doing a "compare and contrast" of draft-ietf-mpls-sfc and draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation. If anyone thinks that would be helpful then I'd be happy to work on that with Andy.
 
That would make the agenda ordering...
- draft-malis-mpls-sfc-encapsulation presentation 
- compare and contrast the two drafts
- draft-ietf-mpls-sfc open issues
 
But we are putty in the hands of our chairs.
 
Adrian
 
From: mpls [mailto:mpls-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tarek Saad (tsaad)
Sent: 18 June 2018 15:01
To: mpls@ietf.org
Cc: mpls-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102
 
Hi all,
 
We are building the MPLS WG session’s agenda for IETF102 in Montreal. The preliminary agenda for IETF102, is available at:
 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/agenda.html> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/102/agenda.html
 
The MPLS WG session is currently scheduled for:
Tuesday, July 17, 2018 (EDT), 9:30-12:00  Morning session I
 
Please send slot requests for presenting at the MPLS session copying myself and the WG chairs - indicate draft name, speaker and desired duration. 
If presenting, your slides will be due by Friday July 13th. Please send slides to myself and the WG chairs.
 
A reminder to authors/editors of MPLS WG drafts that will not be discussed/presented at IET102 to send a status report to the WG list by Friday March 13th so it can be included in the MPLS WG progress report.
 
Regards,
Tarek and MPLS WG chairs

[mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Tarek Saad (tsaad)
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Adrian Farrel
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Andrew G. Malis
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Tarek Saad (tsaad)
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Tarek Saad (tsaad)
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Lizhenbin
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Loa Andersson
Re: [mpls] MPLS requests for IETF 102 Andrew G. Malis