Your comments [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com> Fri, 09 November 2007 13:34 UTC
Return-path: <mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqU06-0003Lk-J8; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:34:22 -0500
Received: from mpls by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IqU05-0003Jy-7V for mpls-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:34:21 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqU04-0003Jq-T5 for mpls@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0500
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqU04-0002K1-Gg for mpls@ietf.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0500
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.21,394,1188792000"; d="scan'208";a="136461828"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0500
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lA9DYK8g021237; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:34:20 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id lA9DY3dw021457; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:34:19 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.112]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:34:15 -0500
Received: from 10.86.104.180 ([10.86.104.180]) by xmb-rtp-213.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.112]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 13:34:15 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 08:34:13 -0500
Subject: Your comments [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
From: JP Vasseur <jvasseur@cisco.com>
To: Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com
Message-ID: <C359CC05.16BF5%jvasseur@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Your comments [mpls] working group last call for draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps
Thread-Index: Acgi1Tc6demiyI7IEdyHogANk8WjQA==
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Nov 2007 13:34:15.0407 (UTC) FILETIME=[38A97FF0:01C822D5]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1181-5.000.1023-15534.002
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.834900-8.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=2067; t=1194615260; x=1195479260; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jvasseur@cisco.com; z=From:=20JP=20Vasseur=20<jvasseur@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Your=20comments=20[mpls]=20working=20group=20last=20call=20fo r=0A=20draft-ietf-mpls-number-0-bw-te-lsps |Sender:=20 |To:=20<Attila.Takacs@ericsson.com>; bh=AaUg57P4Zoueh4xBzNNICKV2yeg6kS0WhdVU6We1S2g=; b=wCA4Lx49kO9770tg3HLDbnl4SewBO+Tn2A0D/6BHtDwuHuMKhcDDeaui+cXYcZbCywo/0ez6 cdVtD1dqk0YNqrGu5gKSpSyi5u851KEAT3CTJisbEn6UXvgKMvKgyKOU;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=jvasseur@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Cc: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: mpls@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/mpls>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: mpls-bounces@lists.ietf.org
> Hi Atila,
>
> Thanks for your comments - See in line,
> Hi all,
>
> Some comments and questions on the draft.
>
> Best regards,
> Attila
>
>
> Section 1,
> -remove the full stops after the expansion of acronyms
> JP> ?
> Section 2,
> -paragraph 1: remove the explanation "(TE LSP signaled with zero
> bandwidth)"
> JP> Reworded as "TE LSP signaled with 0 bandwidth"
> -paragraph 2: the text is unclear on what is referred by "such metrics"
> in the last sentence. To clarify remove the parenthesis from "(other
> metric...)" and change "other metric..." => "on metrics, e.g.,
> percentage of reserved bandwidth or the number of hops." Maybe the last
> sentence should simply state something like: "Unfortunately, in the
> presence of unconstrained TE LSPs constraints on reserved bandwidth and
> number of LSPs may be misleading and may lead to poorly load balanced
> traffic."
> JP> Clarification added "such metrics (e.g. path cost, number of hops, ...)
> are usually ineffective"
>
> -paragraph 5 ("Note that...") and 7 ("Furthermore, the...") should be
> moved after paragraph 3
> JP> Right, done.
>
> -paragraph 6: ("TE LSPs signaled..."): why do you exclude provisioned
> LSPs? I can understand that there are cases where the information on
> management plane provisioned LSPs is not needed/available, however I
> think the proposed extensions should be more general and allow
> collecting information on all the unconstrained LSPs in the TED.
> Wouldn't it be possible to have two fields to include both the number of
> unconstrained signaled and provisioned LSPs in the new TLV?
>
> JP> Yes, it should actually read "Unconstrained TE LSPs that are configured
and provisioned through a management system are not included in the count
that is reported". Thanks.
> Section 3,
> -maybe a figure would be appropriate showing the new TLV format.
>
> JP>> always happy to add a figure but the TLV format cannot be more simple
> than that.
> Section 4,
> -change ISIS to IS-IS
> JP> Done, thanks.
> JP.
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls