[mpls] Re: 答复: Working Group Adoption Poll for draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector

[Joel Halpern <[e-mail]>]

Aijun, I posted a point-by-point technical rebuttl of the issues that 
were raised.  Of those responses, there was some discussion that did not 
actual prove there were issues for two of the points.  For the other 
rebuttals, there was no response.  As far as I can tell, there is no 
obstacle to the chairs calling for a WG last call.

Now, having said that, I expect that issues will be raised if such a 
last call takes place.  And those issues will be discussed.  And the 
chairs will decide if the results of that discussion leads to a 
successful or unsuccessful last call.  That is in fact the purpose of a 
last call.

Yours,

Joel

On 4/28/2025 10:30 PM, Aijun Wang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given the intense discussions of this adoption call, the dispution of 
> ISD/PSD, the ambiguous future of MNA based application, the transition 
> of new MPLS WG etc, , I suggest to postpone the adoption call of this 
> document.
>
> The WG should provide the community, the operator the unified 
> solution, not instead of some distinctive, proprietary solutions.
>
> Some comprises should be coordinated.
>
> PS. I don’t like  John E. Drake’s tedious, “argument by emphatic 
> assertion” (quote from his description to other persons).
>
>       Please state out your technical argument points once when you 
> want to argue with others, or else, please stay in quiet and just 
> listen to other experts’ discussions.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Aijun Wang
>
> China Telecom
>
> *发件人:*[e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] *代表 *[e-mail]
> *发送时间:*2025年4月15日16:30
> *收件人:*[e-mail]
> *抄送:*[e-mail]; [e-mail]
> *主题:*[mpls] Working Group Adoption Poll for 
> draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector
>
> Dear WG,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting 
> draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector as a MPLS working group document.
>
> Please send your comments (support/not support) to the MPLS working 
> group mailing list ([e-mail])
>
> Please give a technical motivation for your support/not support, 
> especially if you think that the document
>
> should not be adopted as a working group document.
>
> There are three IPR disclosures against this document.
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-li-mpls-mna-nrp-selector>
>
> All the authors/contributors have stated on the MPLS WG mailing list 
> that they are unaware of any
>
> undisclosed IPR that relates to this document.
>
> This working group adoption poll ends April 29th, 2025.
>
> Regards,
>
> Nic (as MPLS WG Co-chair)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email [e-mail]