Re: [mpls] Working Group last call on draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Working Group(s),

This wglc is closed. We've have not had any comments that needs to be
addressed before requesting publication. However, the nits tool have
two comments and two warnings, a mail has been sent to the authors
asking how they want to address these.

/Loa

On 2016-05-31 18:27, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Working Group,
>
> This is to initiate a two week working group last call on
> draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-09.
>
> Please send your comments to the mpls wg mailing list ([e-mail]).
>
> There were one IPR disclosure against the individual draft that this
> document replaced.
>
> The document shepherd and working group chairs are frequently asked
> about the working group discussions related to any IPR disclosures.
>
> We like to remind the working group that discussion on the content
> and validity of an IPR disclosure should not take place on the MPLS wg
> list or any IETF mailing lists.
>
> However we are looking for simple statements whether you think the
> working group should continue progress the document, regardless of an
> existing IPR disclosure. Please include this information in your
> "support/do not support" when responding to working group adoption
> calls and last calls.
>
> All the authors and contributors (with one exception) have stated on
> the working group mailing list that they are not aware of any other
> IPRs that relates to this draft.
>
> This working group last call ends June 15, 2016.
>
> CCAMP and TICTOC wg's,
>
> This is to inform you that this wglc is taking place, please direct the
> discussion to the mpls wg mailing list.
>
>
> /Loa
> for the MPLS wg chairs