[mpls] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-02: (with DISCUSS)

Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 08 August 2019 02:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F44120099; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification@ietf.org, Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>, mpls-chairs@ietf.org, loa@pi.nu, mpls@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
Message-ID: <156523094247.8301.12013941748188191188.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 19:22:22 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/cNeYT2agGdqaOt7mmP-8I7o3HuY>
Subject: [mpls] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-02: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 02:22:23 -0000

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification-02: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mpls-rfc8287-len-clarification/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This should be very easy to clear up

* Section 4.3

Since this whole draft is about clarifying Sub-TLV length calculations I think
this section needs to cover the length calculation for the unnumbered Adjacency
Type (Adj. Type 0 in RFC8287).