[mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7110 (4196)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 09 December 2014 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CACB71A1A2F; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:21:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chQjVP4ulvTn; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357E31A1A0B; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:21:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id DC87D181CEB; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 11:20:56 -0800 (PST)
To: ietfc@btconnect.com, mach.chen@huawei.com, wayne.caowei@huawei.com, ning.so@tatacommunications.com, frederic.jounay@orange.ch, simon.delord@alcatel-lucent.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20141209192056.DC87D181CEB@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 11:20:56 -0800
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/eaio7M1JBg8SwpmeUx9Ju86_dAI
Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, iesg@ietf.org, mpls@ietf.org
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7110 (4196)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 19:21:49 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC7110, "Return Path Specified Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7110&eid=4196 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Editorial Reported by: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Date Reported: 2014-12-09 Verified by: Adrian Farrel (IESG) Section: 4.3.1 Original Text ------------- the recommended type value is 26. Corrected Text -------------- the type value is 26. Notes ----- The WG commended a value of 26 to IANA for the "IPv4 RSVP Tunnel sub-TLV Type" which IANA confirmed. Leaving in the 'recommended' introduces a element of uncertainty that is best avoided. -------------------------------------- RFC7110 (draft-ietf-mpls-return-path-specified-lsp-ping-15) -------------------------------------- Title : Return Path Specified Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping Publication Date : January 2014 Author(s) : M. Chen, W. Cao, S. Ning, F. Jounay, S. Delord Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC7110 (4196) RFC Errata System
- [mpls] [Errata Verified] RFC7110 (4196) RFC Errata System