Re: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping an MPLS working group document

[Ping Pan <[e-mail]>]

+1
On Jun 3, 2013 6:42 PM, "Mach Chen" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Yes/support
>
> Best regards,
> Mach
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> Loa
> > Andersson
> > Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 12:35 AM
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Cc: [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> > Subject: [mpls] Poll to see if we have consensus to make
> > draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping an MPLS working group document
> >
> > Working Group,
> >
> > This is to start a two week poll on adopting
> > draft-lim-mpls-proxy-lsp-ping-02 as an MPLS working group document.
> >
> > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working
> > group mailing list (mpls at ietf.org). Please give a technical
> > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that
> > the document should not be adopted as a working group document.
> >
> > This poll ends June 14, 2013.
> >
> > There are two IPR claims against this document:
> >
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/778/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2087/
> >
> >
> > The authors has stated on the working group mailing list
> > that they are not aware of any other IPR claims against this draft.
> > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and
> > aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose
> > this is now.
> >
> > /Loa
> > (mpls wg co-chair)
> > --
> >
> >
> > Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
> > Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
> > Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>