Re: [mpls] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt

"Ryoo, Jeong-dong " <> Wed, 22 February 2017 03:15 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF71129411; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:15:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H7uwxlSK2JPG; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:15:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524B812953C; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 19:15:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:15:16 +0900
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 12:15:13 +0900
From: "Ryoo, Jeong-dong " <>
To: Russ White <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt
Thread-Index: AdJ1wEzme3EM7z46T7Cosidny7nB8QW+LGJl
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:15:12 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <012001d275c0$83b518e0$8b1f4aa0$>
In-Reply-To: <012001d275c0$83b518e0$8b1f4aa0$>
Accept-Language: ko-KR, en-US
Content-Language: ko-KR
x-new-displayname: UnlvbywgSmVvbmctZG9uZyA=
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5B4A6CBE3924BB41A3BEE462A8E0B75A292A850ASMTP2etriinfo_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [mpls] RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 03:15:21 -0000

Hi, all.

A new version of draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates document has been uploaded.

Although there was no specific comment for text change from the Routing Directorate review,

the authors of this document revised the draft to reflect the previous comments from Loa,

Best regards,


(On behalf ot co-authors)

보낸 사람 : "Russ White" <>
보낸 날짜 : 2017-01-24 06:34:53 ( +09:00 )
받는 사람 : <>
참조 : <>rg>, <>rg>, <>
제목 : RtgDir review: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt


I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see ​ Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-aps-updates-02.txt

Reviewer: Russ White

Review Date: 23 January 2017

IETF LC End Date: ??

Intended Status: Standards Track

Summary: No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

The quality and readability of this document is excellent; the draft explains what it needs to explain clearly and in precise terms (given the reader has read the correct background documents).

Major Issues: No major issues found.

Minor Issues: No minor issues found.

Sincerely --