Re: [mpls] Feedback for WG DOC status of draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01

Nitin, George, and Kireeti,

> WG,
> 
>   We had presented draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 at the
> Vancouver IETF. The abstract is enclosed below for reference. We would
> like WG feedback on whether the draft is ready to be adopted as a WG
> document. If it is not, what needs to be addressed to make it one? 
> 
> Thanks
> Nitin, George, Kireeti.

I think the draft is ready to be accepted as an MPLS WG document.

Yakov.

> 
> Abstract:
> This document describes methods for performing lsp-ping traceroute over
> mpls tunnels and stitched LSPs.  The techniques outlined in RFC 4379 are
> insufficient to perform correct traceroute validation and path discovery
> for a LSP that goes over other mpls tunnels. RFC 4379 also does not have
> any procedures for tracing stitched LSPs. This document describes new
> procedures that can be used in conjunction with the standard procedures
> described in RFC 4379 to trace such LSPs.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01.
> txt
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls