Re: [mpls] Feedback for WG DOC status of draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01

I believe draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 is ready to be
adopted as a WG document.

rahul

On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, Yakov Rekhter wrote:

> Nitin, George, and Kireeti,
>
> > WG,
> >
> >   We had presented draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 at the
> > Vancouver IETF. The abstract is enclosed below for reference. We would
> > like WG feedback on whether the draft is ready to be adopted as a WG
> > document. If it is not, what needs to be addressed to make it one?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Nitin, George, Kireeti.
> >
> > Abstract:
> > This document describes methods for performing lsp-ping traceroute over
> > mpls tunnels and stitched LSPs.  The techniques outlined in RFC 4379 are
> > insufficient to perform correct traceroute validation and path discovery
> > for a LSP that goes over other mpls tunnels. RFC 4379 also does not have
> > any procedures for tracing stitched LSPs. This document describes new
> > procedures that can be used in conjunction with the standard procedures
> > described in RFC 4379 to trace such LSPs.
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/wg/mpls/draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01.
> > txt
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mpls mailing list
> > mpls@lists.ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@lists.ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
>

_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls