IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (6434)

Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> Sat, 20 February 2021 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <huubatwork@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493E43A0AFA for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, GB_FREEMAIL_DISPTO=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHrqEB4NrLi1 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x529.google.com (mail-ed1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D0E3A0AF9 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x529.google.com with SMTP id n1so12877160edv.2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rpA3tTwL+oXLodWb9WJJnfy4iyO+Wvv2IU32+JBi8Gc=; b=Sv8n67vNVGE4mBYrInd+wTa6WckiWx1wwBpGB4eaYgsUEvveen9n5KS4AvzfJFlY/0 OCHPFTAtTXGtlFY4BoSi7rbtP0oHCWcjQQ9Y//Uz4ydhZglDUf1ecAQmXTt8xYWmp0Zu Oxz3/Yeap09VdIu+6XiXD8hus7fGauJW9nIz+deP5fTO036vtI0ucZhsgtP2misjybI9 sUlW1tmiuhXoM0YNkL0WHWHKIvcGKKs4bBbiQbw/QQrAXp7a41cbnPOiBU84jOJ7Ga3i vgXw3BDsQXrOh6fSPJk8sJpR91VbhTH+Xt6ZEBAYHBrKnIJROli40SesnAbqNHvekeuT kRFw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:cc:references:from :message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rpA3tTwL+oXLodWb9WJJnfy4iyO+Wvv2IU32+JBi8Gc=; b=ctr3S85RsKkphrdKgxydBkB+oTtnW9ZNh1hQOeEH1gAFMIhtVGCtnl+fqhH28AwnPJ oxQA8Wviqp87GhrBiTgLP12PqFegKogmOtU/LoUoj+b3+8u5tG9mj/qRIjnukPhKxNnw LaX5cdRdusTRLrpi93l9JgmHxnAj1Lw3MPYPrPgeENyNZ7cwGc3MqRGHOSsQXIsek3it vGJVW0NU3bEc2P7Qt4WcUrW3Uaw7AI6yaBsL8+TrK6CcIc7CJf4zaVXgxM5jMsgItu7p 2nUf3elGtKedrx5ilhULko5fNNnwq595M2uuvH9gk6LhQyAdRpR9iev3Rp6t3RXhXzHR b4gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ScSI7L8BSk4safCWEdyKt9MjVQm0tmi0LCq6dGQ8oSvbRg8ZK Pcx3IWqY4WmKIXXd8hQQnXE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzK2c8qzo8gGs3d53mfQQK7Ayl/qbu8d6rtDncXHf6Izt6+4+dBlULL+eBgQzyGFgngfPWDtw==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3192:: with SMTP id di18mr11611347edb.172.1613782522947; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from McAsterix.local ([2a02:a211:8e81:2e00:d80b:1113:bca9:c2e1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u3sm5207758eje.63.2021.02.19.16.55.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 16:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Reply-To: huubatwork@gmail.com
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com, dbrungard@att.com, malcolm.betts@huawei.com, nurit.sprecher@nsn.com, satoshi.ueno@ntt.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, n.leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, Peter.Goorts@mil.be
References: <20210220003340.16D83F4075E@rfc-editor.org>
From: Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e52f6300-ed9c-3180-c32c-34c0b9ced68e@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 01:55:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210220003340.16D83F4075E@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/jwjS_yY3GGCGP3zmjLGuDdyQsE4>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (6434)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 00:55:26 -0000

All,

Between version 09 of the draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-09
and version 10 of the draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-10

there was a enumbering of some secions.

Section 2.8 was renumbered to 2.5.

So <relevant section> == 2.5

Best regards, Huub.
==================


On 20/02/2021 01:33, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5654,
> "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6434
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Peter Goorts <Peter.Goorts@mil.be>
> 
> Section: 2.4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery	
> 	       functions described in Section 2.8.	 	
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery	
> 	       functions described in <relevant section>.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> There is no section 2.8 in this document. Maybe there is a typo in the section number or the section is removed. If reference to a section is made, that section needs to exist.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC5654 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile
> Publication Date    : September 2009
> Author(s)           : B. Niven-Jenkins, Ed., D. Brungard, Ed., M. Betts, Ed., N. Sprecher, S. Ueno
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 


-- 
================================================================
Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email