IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (6434)

Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com> Sun, 21 February 2021 05:43 UTC

Return-Path: <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C65F3A15E3 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ngtsn37Yjf5j for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA983A14FA for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id cx11so4019325pjb.4 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=LHoo4G5iHAszm+3Dx6dxrWo2Eq8Q1P2olm9HbQ284oo=; b=vDnRF/4zUStbss2xihSc8vnwSpsMNWJtItOjaTlU8sLKkWYQx1KZpe1DRjPPbFyRKL Jl8PyC9o+VhHRVl6jZq/d1Frn4wI0EbCLDgUX1X1x8CqSahoVTO0KybU5xIvfRjZT1Hc jnUqjIrfzK5nwDhMtZxgLOtJrj/q1BQ7Kq41KZZdFNnn7GDwA2KG+zXuMWyCp7LHBCvx ukH4BP2XrFeAhBhg/xZa2c+XQLyFoqjb2+ynNGOKAUnCJZuVM76u+FyZw8bUndPoyvAs 0BENQqaBL8BPFx15eVzSgRWAXPV8yW4pYQxg0DIj25s9VS9l+vG8d7LnwO9IHO+JCkzU yvCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=LHoo4G5iHAszm+3Dx6dxrWo2Eq8Q1P2olm9HbQ284oo=; b=ETpPjyV5OuLdM/Fd3Eu9aTUS0t+AtxZDg/2Bif8tDDb0h6FYwYGqbiP1NoZru9cwyN 7OCMiccMht+Nct7LfGU5Pq7AMkQufoyE5bCwTQHVg0XV0jNOajxL1GZsN8JPgLj8WvxE 0PNtS3cM27hAgOTehVaVtLZaWm64vOsMG6s9DzFNsqcaEEtreU62V+dT8bxcIPeUgGSN s0TOqmTs6EA6ckdbtarLYIgNXXh/Exr6qOD0hy7wN9coJVfGas6vuejz2E7Q1IrD0K2v 9DDGemlhstrNH7lyUCPJdTB+WGqc/WBovbl/QV7ReeYSXki/Fw7sTZE+KCInvb70lNDZ 6WMQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532FjZvukwVr/SxnfWWa1PIxEnNwWb0K7BmdKiRYqPW5Q46u+bSW T/sOfa79WvnxywsvULszK/k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxodw3WjhCxPctvVD7XKOYu78G6xoOqn4tmwKoZpYyciPX6vz8Xm7J9JFYeBHmqFeE8rL7piQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2a8d:: with SMTP id j13mr14358246pjd.173.1613886207910; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.30] ([124.104.184.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r68sm14727450pfc.49.2021.02.20.21.43.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 21:43:27 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Loa Andersson <loa.pi.nu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e52f6300-ed9c-3180-c32c-34c0b9ced68e@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:43:24 +0800
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, benjamin.niven-jenkins@bt.com, dbrungard@att.com, malcolm.betts@huawei.com, nurit.sprecher@nsn.com, satoshi.ueno@ntt.com, db3546@att.com, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, martin.vigoureux@nokia.com, loa@pi.nu, N.Leymann@telekom.de, tsaad.net@gmail.com, mpls@ietf.org, Peter.Goorts@mil.be
Message-Id: <5FD11C54-9058-49AF-9C27-12DC851956A6@gmail.com>
References: <e52f6300-ed9c-3180-c32c-34c0b9ced68e@gmail.com>
To: huubatwork@gmail.com
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18D52)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/wXk0NjTNCLDAL6Lxf3qcnBN5lkY>
Subject: Re: [mpls] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC5654 (6434)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 05:43:53 -0000

All, 

This correct, let us keep it for a potential update.  

/Loa

Sent from my iPhone

> On 20 Feb 2021, at 08:55, Huub van Helvoort <huubatwork@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> All,
> 
> Between version 09 of the draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-09
> and version 10 of the draft:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-10
> 
> there was a enumbering of some secions.
> 
> Section 2.8 was renumbered to 2.5.
> 
> So <relevant section> == 2.5
> 
> Best regards, Huub.
> ==================
> 
> 
>> On 20/02/2021 01:33, RFC Errata System wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC5654,
>> "Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile".
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6434
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Editorial
>> Reported by: Peter Goorts <Peter.Goorts@mil.be>
>> Section: 2.4
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> 52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery    
>>           functions described in Section 2.8.        
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> 52  An MPLS-TP control plane MUST support operation of the recovery    
>>           functions described in <relevant section>.
>> Notes
>> -----
>> There is no section 2.8 in this document. Maybe there is a typo in the section number or the section is removed. If reference to a section is made, that section needs to exist.
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC5654 (draft-ietf-mpls-tp-requirements-10)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile
>> Publication Date    : September 2009
>> Author(s)           : B. Niven-Jenkins, Ed., D. Brungard, Ed., M. Betts, Ed., N. Sprecher, S. Ueno
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : Multiprotocol Label Switching
>> Area                : Routing
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
>> _______________________________________________
>> mpls mailing list
>> mpls@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
> 
> 
> -- 
> ================================================================
> Always remember that you are unique...just like everyone else...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mpls mailing list
> mpls@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email