Re: [mpls] Poll for adoption for draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-03

["Adrian Farrel" <[e-mail]>]

It has become customary for co-authors of drafts to write emails saying
"Support" in these circumstances.
 
In this case, as a co-author, I think the draft is more than ready for adoption
by the working group. It clearly fits within the charter, has been discussed
quite a bit on the list resulting in a number of updates, has been reviewed by
the MPLS-RT with corresponding updates, and is (I think) pretty well cooked.
 
Of course, I'd be happy to see more comments and clarifications, and I think
that giving the WG control over the content of the document would be the best
way to ensure consensus on what it says. I hope that we can adopt soon, and move
to WG last call shortly thereafter.
 
I believe that the WG will need to address two administrative points:
- Is it Standards track or informational?
- Does it formally Update RFC 5586?
 
I think both of these questions can be addressed as a separate matter from
adoption, and I hope the chairs can help us make the correct decision.
 
Thanks,
Adrian
 
From: mpls [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Ross Callon
Sent: 06 October 2015 20:34
To: [e-mail]
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: [mpls] Poll for adoption for
draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-03
 
This is to start a two week poll on adopting
draft-vainshtein-mpls-gal-tc-ttl-handling-03
as an MPLS working group document.
 
Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working group 
mailing list ([e-mail]).
 
There are no IPR disclosures pertaining to the draft. The authors have all
indicated that 
they are not aware of any IPR that applies to this document.
 
This poll for adoption will end Wednesday October 21, 2015. 
 
Thanks, Ross