[mpls] [Errata Rejected] RFC5443 (4686)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Wed, 13 July 2016 21:42 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A8B12D7FC; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m0f8Fz16-G0o; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 006F912D688; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id D6233B80FD2; Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
To: alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com, Markus.Jork@genband.com, alia.atlas@bt.com, lufang@cisco.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20160713214209.D6233B80FD2@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 14:42:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/pI7s9FflQSF1B15O80RPcYJCSwk>
Cc: mpls@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [mpls] [Errata Rejected] RFC5443 (4686)
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:42:11 -0000
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC5443, "LDP IGP Synchronization". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=5443&eid=4686 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Alexander Okonnikov <alexander.okonnikov@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2016-05-06 Rejected by: Deborah Brungard (IESG) Section: 3 Original Text ------------- Corrected Text -------------- (At the end of the section) In case of OSPF while router advertises maximum cost, virtual link(s) that cross link under question, could be broken. This is because virtual link, which underlying path has cost greater than 0xFFFF, considered as inoperational. As a result, virtually connected area(s) could be isolated from backbone. Notes ----- In case there are two or more links on path taken by virtual link, and one of them has max link cost, path metric will exceed value 0xffff. As a result virtual link will become inoperational. --VERIFIER NOTES-- This update requires consensus by the Working Group. -------------------------------------- RFC5443 (draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-igp-sync-04) -------------------------------------- Title : LDP IGP Synchronization Publication Date : March 2009 Author(s) : M. Jork, A. Atlas, L. Fang Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : Multiprotocol Label Switching Area : Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [mpls] [Errata Rejected] RFC5443 (4686) RFC Errata System
- [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5443 (4686) RFC Errata System