[mpls] WG Poll closed - Re: poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap a working group document
Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu> Thu, 17 April 2014 13:28 UTC
Return-Path: <loa@pi.nu>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FF31A0127 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:28:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NwjuYUVFGTwu for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CC71A014E for <mpls@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.133] (81-236-221-144-no93.tbcn.telia.com [81.236.221.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB98C1800905; Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:28:49 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <534FD712.8080004@pi.nu>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 15:28:50 +0200
From: Loa Andersson <loa@pi.nu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "mpls@ietf.org" <mpls@ietf.org>
References: <53391A55.8000303@pi.nu>
In-Reply-To: <53391A55.8000303@pi.nu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/sSOIZXTXonpzJovW_9Sj8G52YLE
Cc: "mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <mpls-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap@tools.ietf.org" <draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [mpls] WG Poll closed - Re: poll to see if we have consensus to make draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap a working group document
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:28:58 -0000
Working Group, This wg poll is closed and we have a new working group document. Authors, Can you please re-post the document as draft-mpls-ietf-ipv6-only-gap-00.txt without any other changes and dates. /Loa On 2014-03-31 09:33, Loa Andersson wrote: > Working Group, > > This is to start a two week poll on adopting > draft-george-mpls-ipv6-only-gap as an MPLS working group document. > > Please send your comments (support/not support) to the mpls working > group mailing list (mpls@ietf.org). Please give a technical > motivation for your support/not support, especially if you think that > the document should not be adopted as a working group document. > > There are no IPR claim against this document. > > The authors and contributors has stated on the working group mailing > list that they are not aware of any other IPR claims against this draft. > > However if you are on the the mpls working group mailing list and > aware of IPR that relates to this draft, the time to disclose > this is now. > > This poll ends April 14, 2014. > > /Loa > > for the MPLS wg co-chairs > -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64
- [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to make d… Loa Andersson
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Mark Tinka
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Mach Chen
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Dhruv Dhody
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Henderickx, Wim (Wim)
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Gregory Mirsky
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Nobo Akiya (nobo)
- [mpls] 答复: poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Lizhenbin
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Dorian Davis
- Re: [mpls] poll to see if we have consensus to ma… Rajiv Papneja
- [mpls] WG Poll closed - Re: poll to see if we hav… Loa Andersson