[mpls] Question on rfc4206

dexter i <dexter.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 17 May 2016 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dexter.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mpls@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367A012D140 for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 23:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qkWJlp9Ia6Li for <mpls@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2016 23:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2205F12D510 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f66so7134878vkh.2 for <mpls@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:58:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hf804gCw32c7YDd5rHcJp1IFQKsb/tbWWOijGneSNKE=; b=WBw5po5QDsD7SRY/ENCAhVPijlTMyF68sb3Zc4iMB5NQ0Df5rGJpZmP+ry7gK01gTr /lHeYqbCA9hvJ6OBNmZqMMCsjy15/xbpWUR1y69mjJd5Ww893OXizz1NnJzjmQ3oRval kVHN1m4H9vE3IPm46PZklDLpqYIPFxxqz2rxbl0sRGp2G6hIS6OZpDOPq2qetubkLw5c z9A3P0s9Fl1DAzA8xE3vbfJqj1kz6GraadgKGVTKM0yVgDXl/H2bnZNYGgSgAv0yx2JK VztKIA/DKY6Jc3UE3CeQf8x8Amvlt+ch4GJFGKpEs5cHeXl0Ije2AyDdXCSAJ7Qh1q4U +sYQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=hf804gCw32c7YDd5rHcJp1IFQKsb/tbWWOijGneSNKE=; b=lO0wlLV5HjL0lMDELCHyn2sKwsVrMA0wYgJjn57Z0GsfwxgAwd9zqBJFCgB8TYzNH5 fW/n/vwaKp7/XjskRi4r5sVAvMcKyKr7Cr6B+6TUhhrN6TXDF/2jtXI/PvzkU9d45PB/ FKUbnVL+pASRBfhVDJtwCJ+PR4ZBfvjf56P/C67nXN8h6f0zHtgJDqlE8H77ypEdPtW3 4ie1Omcxiy+Z4y4ruVLVKOVuyQXM/j189FZgWFVK6IZMkqBju6NkNzRWMqtIC93Xt+Ll d8Lqkp6t+oe8D0ohgbo5K9DjXG5i65OHe0Psj+/2VnIR9KU2NMuZ5kAcxlcZLPW5+8/P 0JTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXHTvEEBu5Xpo5DUQVTovQx04sbQmSEec++KpR8lgevHk6ebgi4XzIvxl8Y198ev517ZRz69Nr0jzD9Yw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.159.37.215 with SMTP id 81mr1351727uaf.140.1463464731895; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.159.38.53 with HTTP; Mon, 16 May 2016 22:58:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:28:51 +0530
Message-ID: <CAM9prMJy_aFt48cmCGhrD=Eu=wyBNv7morcBchj2Jwwa=9iHPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: dexter i <dexter.ietf@gmail.com>
To: mpls@ietf.org, kireeti@juniper.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cf7587c72bb0533036f5b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mpls/ui7eNqqw80Y2fE6ETn2kgUiF6EM>
Subject: [mpls] Question on rfc4206
X-BeenThere: mpls@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-Protocol Label Switching WG <mpls.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mpls/>
List-Post: <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls>, <mailto:mpls-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 06:05:27 -0000

Hi,

I was going through the rfc4206. It describes adding an lsp as one of
the link into IGP. Is it not similar to IGP shortcuts described in rfc3906.
what additional functionality does 4206 provide over 3906 besides it
is setup in GMPLS environment.

thanks