Re: [mpowr] Re: Getting Bad Ideas to Fail Early
Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 10 February 2004 07:27 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA03573 for <mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:27:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqSI5-0001CP-Ie for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:41 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1A7Qfub004591 for mpowr-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqSI3-0001Bp-MR for mpowr-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:39 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA03529 for <mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSI0-0002XC-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:26:36 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSH3-0002Sv-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:25:37 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSGU-0002Oc-00 for mpowr-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:25:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqSGU-0000mI-L8; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:25:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AqSG6-0000gg-LI for mpowr@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:24:38 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA03374 for <mpowr@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:24:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSG2-0002Nu-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:24:35 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSF5-0002Ja-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:23:36 -0500
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AqSEO-0002BH-00 for mpowr@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 02:22:52 -0500
Received: from halvestr-w2k1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE90361B92; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:22:21 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 23:12:50 -0800
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: David.Partain@ericsson.com, mpowr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mpowr] Re: Getting Bad Ideas to Fail Early
Message-ID: <2480163516.1076368370@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: mpowr-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: mpowr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Management Positions -- Oversight, Work and Results <mpowr.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:mpowr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr>, <mailto:mpowr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
--On 30. januar 2004 12:31 +0100 "David Partain (LI/EAB)" <david.partain@ericsson.com> wrote: >> > What do we do if the WG refuses to acknowledge that an idea is >> > "bad" and forges ahead? >> >> Wait for IESG to decide. It would be nice to design some procedure for >> IESG to decide sooner (early) rather than at PS stage. > > Might be a very good idea, but at the risk of making them > interrupt driven, which I personally find to be a hard way > to work. that would be no change ... the IESG document evaluation process is currently highly interrupt driven - the interrupt is the other ADs putting documents on the agenda..... _______________________________________________ mpowr mailing list mpowr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpowr
- Re: [mpowr] Re: Getting Bad Ideas to Fail Early Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [mpowr] Re: Getting Bad Ideas to Fail Early John C Klensin
- Re: [mpowr] Re: Getting Bad Ideas to Fail Early David Partain